On Mon, 2013-05-06 at 19:11 -0400, Parag Warudkar wrote:Apparently UVD doesn't yet work everywhere - so allow it to be
disabled. Shaves off some reboot and suspend/resume time on machines
where it doesn't work. Might be useful for problematic chips in the
future as well.
Patch attached as well as inline below.
Signed-off-by: Parag Warudkar <parag.lkml@xxxxxxxxx>
[...]
@@ -168,6 +169,9 @@ int radeon_fastfb = 0;No more negative boolean options please.
MODULE_PARM_DESC(no_wb, "Disable AGP writeback for scratch registers");
module_param_named(no_wb, radeon_no_wb, int, 0444);
+MODULE_PARM_DESC(no_uvd, "Disable UVD");
+module_param_named(no_uvd, radeon_no_uvd, int, 0444);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_uvd.cReturning -EINVAL here results in rather misleading dmesg output I
b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_uvd.c
index 906e5c0..93a7dbb 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_uvd.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_uvd.c
@@ -58,7 +58,8 @@ int radeon_uvd_init(struct radeon_device *rdev)
unsigned long bo_size;
const char *fw_name;
int i, r;
-
+ if (radeon_no_uvd)
+ return -EINVAL;
INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&rdev->uvd.idle_work, radeon_uvd_idle_work_handler);
think. This should probably be handled more gracefully.
Anyway, the return statement would need to be indented per the kernel
coding style, and please leave empty lines before the if and after the
return.