Re: h8300 SYMBOL_NAME() breakage

[James Hogan]

On 06/05/13 13:31, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Commit e1b5bb6d1236d4ad2084c53aa83dde7cdf6f8eea ("consolidate cond_syscall
> and SYSCALL_ALIAS declarations") broke the h8300 build because it removed
> the duplicate SYMBOL_NAME from arch/h8300/include/asm/linkage.h, and all
> the h8300 asm files include <asm/linkage.h> instead of <linux/linkage.h>.
> (yes, this was in -next).
> 
> Commit 126de6b20bfb82cc19012d5048f11f339ae5a021 ("linkage.h: fix build
> breakage due to symbol prefix handling") broke it even more, by removing
> SYMBOL_NAME() and replacing it by __SYMBOL_NAME().

Yes, sorry about that. I had assumed h8300 still referred to it's own
definition of SYMBOL_NAME from arch/h8300/include/asm/linkage.h, which
was still intact on modules-next where I had last checked it.

Cheers
James

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/