[PATCH 076/118] NFSv4: Handle NFS4ERR_DELAY and NFS4ERR_GRACE in nfs4_open_delegation_recall

[Luis Henriques]

3.5.7.12 -stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@xxxxxxxxxx>

commit 8b6cc4d6f841d31f72fe7478453759166d366274 upstream.

A server shouldn't normally return NFS4ERR_GRACE if the client holds a
delegation, since no conflicting lock reclaims can be granted, however
the spec does not require the server to grant the open in this
instance

Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@xxxxxxxxxx>
[ luis: adjust context ]
Signed-off-by: Luis Henriques <luis.henriques@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c | 6 ++++++
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)

diff --git a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
index b96aa12..480918e 100644
--- a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
@@ -1381,6 +1381,12 @@ int nfs4_open_delegation_recall(struct nfs_open_context *ctx, struct nfs4_state
 			case -ENOMEM:
 				err = 0;
 				goto out;
+			case -NFS4ERR_DELAY:
+			case -NFS4ERR_GRACE:
+				set_bit(NFS_DELEGATED_STATE, &state->flags);
+				ssleep(1);
+				err = -EAGAIN;
+				goto out;
 		}
 		err = nfs4_handle_exception(server, err, &exception);
 	} while (exception.retry);
-- 
1.8.1.2

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/