Re: [PATCH v2 2/6] ASoC: ux500: Do not clear state if already idle

[Mark Brown]

On Wed, May 08, 2013 at 01:03:26PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:

> Besides, I was more referencing the massively increased effort
> imparted to the developer by applying patches in an arbitrary order.
> Forcing the developer to rearranging and rebase the patch-set causing
> unnecessary merge conflicts. It's better if the maintainer takes the
> patch-set in the order it was written to prevent unnecessary (which is
> the key word here) such things.

Meh, rebase takes care of all this stuff for you and you really need to
be rebasing anyway to take account of changes sent by other people.  The
problem you were having was that you weren't rebasing at all.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature