Re: [PATCH 03/21] ARM: shmobile: don't call irqchip_init unconditionally

[Bastian Hecht]

Hi,

2013/5/8 Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>:
> On Thursday 02 May 2013, Simon Horman wrote:
>> > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/intc-r8a7740.c b/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/intc-r8a7740.c
>> > > index 8871f77..5dc57f1 100644
>> > > --- a/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/intc-r8a7740.c
>> > > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/intc-r8a7740.c
>> > > @@ -53,14 +53,23 @@ static void __init r8a7740_init_irq_common(void)
>> > >
>> > >  void __init r8a7740_init_irq_of(void)
>> > >  {
>> > > +       if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF))
>> > > +               return;
>> > > +
>> > >         irqchip_init();
>> >
>> > Why not have an empty irqchip_init? I'd guess we'll need this on other
>> > platforms and your default mach.
>>
>> Thanks, I think that could work.
>>
>> I will see about making it so.
>
> Ping

I have sent out a patch adding an empty irqchip_init() when
CONFIG_IRQCHIP is not set with the subject
[PATCH] irqchip: Add irqchip_init dummy function

> Linux-next is still broken for me. There is also anothe shmobile build bug,
> I'll send a separate patch for that, which also needs to go into your tree.

Oh thanks Arnd for this fix!

Cheers,

 Bastian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/