Re: [PATCH 2/9] liblockdep: Wrap kernel/lockdep.c to allow usagefrom userspace
From: Peter Zijlstra
Date: Wed May 08 2013 - 09:37:29 EST
On Wed, May 08, 2013 at 09:27:46AM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote:
> [snip]
>
> Hi Peter,
>
> You're right - I broke multithreading for some odd reason (mostly me being stupid)
> after having it working :/
>
> It's enough to set the __thread flag on current_obj:
>
> diff --git a/tools/lib/lockdep/common.c b/tools/lib/lockdep/common.c
> index eb5e481..8ef602f 100644
> --- a/tools/lib/lockdep/common.c
> +++ b/tools/lib/lockdep/common.c
> @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
> #include <unistd.h>
> #include <sys/syscall.h>
>
> -static struct task_struct current_obj;
> +static __thread struct task_struct current_obj;
>
> /* lockdep wants these */
> bool debug_locks = true;
>
> Since we don't need any special initialization of the struct at any point. This
> means that the patch above is enough and we don't need to hook pthread_create.
>
I tried googling but failed to find the TLS initialization rules. Are they
zero'd for each thread or copied about or what? And is this documented or
implementation behaviour?
If its consistently zero'd then I suppose you're right and we can get away with
just adding __thread; *phew*.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/