Re: [PATCH 3/9] vt: delete unneeded functions register_con_driver|take_over_console

[Peter Hurley]

On 05/08/2013 04:45 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, May 08, 2013 at 04:37:14PM -0400, Peter Hurley wrote:
> > On 05/08/2013 04:14 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> > > On Wed, May 08, 2013 at 03:56:49PM -0400, Peter Hurley wrote:
> > > > On 05/08/2013 02:13 PM, Wang YanQing wrote:
> > > > > Now there is no place use register_con_driver|take_over_console,
> > > > > and we can achieve their function with do_register_con_driver|
> > > > > do_take_over_console easily, so just delete them to reduce code duplication.
> > > > >
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Wang YanQing <udknight@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > ---
> > > > >   drivers/tty/vt/vt.c     | 45 ---------------------------------------------
> > > > >   include/linux/console.h |  2 --
> > > > >   2 files changed, 47 deletions(-)
> > > > >
> > > > > diff --git a/drivers/tty/vt/vt.c b/drivers/tty/vt/vt.c
> > > > > index fbd447b..852d470 100644
> > > > > --- a/drivers/tty/vt/vt.c
> > > > > +++ b/drivers/tty/vt/vt.c
> > > > > @@ -3576,26 +3576,6 @@ err:
> > > > >   	return retval;
> > > > >   }
> > > > >
> > > > > -/**
> > > > > - * register_con_driver - register console driver to console layer
> > > > > - * @csw: console driver
> > > > > - * @first: the first console to take over, minimum value is 0
> > > > > - * @last: the last console to take over, maximum value is MAX_NR_CONSOLES -1
> > > > > - *
> > > > > - * DESCRIPTION: This function registers a console driver which can later
> > > > > - * bind to a range of consoles specified by @first and @last. It will
> > > > > - * also initialize the console driver by calling con_startup().
> > > > > - */
> > > > > -int register_con_driver(const struct consw *csw, int first, int last)
> > > > > -{
> > > > > -	int retval;
> > > > > -
> > > > > -	console_lock();
> > > > > -	retval = do_register_con_driver(csw, first, last);
> > > > > -	console_unlock();
> > > > > -	return retval;
> > > > > -}
> > > > > -EXPORT_SYMBOL(register_con_driver);
> > > >
> > > > Maybe register_con_driver() should print a deprecated warning
> > > > for a release or two before we remove it.
> > >
> > > If there are no in-kernel users, why do we need to keep it around?
> >
> > Well, it's not my position that we *need* to keep previously exported
> > symbols around, but I do think a release or two is enough of a
> > heads-up for out-of-tree drivers to transition.
>
> I don't care about out-of-tree drivers, as we have no insight into what
> they do, but they can see everything we can do, it's up to them to keep
> up with us.
>
> Or even better yet, get merged into the tree, and then these types of
> things aren't even an issue.

So now that no in-tree driver declares TTY_HW_COOK_IN/OUT, you're ok
with patches for their removal?

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/