Re: [PATCH V3 20/21] thermal: exynos: Support for TMU regulator definedat device tree

[Eduardo Valentin]

On 07-05-2013 09:01, Amit Daniel Kachhap wrote:
> TMU probe function now checks for a device tree defined regulator.
> For compatibility reasons it is allowed to probe driver even without
> this regulator defined.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.daniel@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  .../devicetree/bindings/thermal/exynos-thermal.txt |    4 ++++
>  drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c               |   19 +++++++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/exynos-thermal.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/exynos-thermal.txt
> index 970eeba..ff62f7a 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/exynos-thermal.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/exynos-thermal.txt
> @@ -14,6 +14,9 @@
>  - interrupts : Should contain interrupt for thermal system
>  - clocks : The main clock for TMU device
>  - clock-names : Thermal system clock name
> +- vtmu-supply: This entry is optional and provides the regulator node supplying
> +		voltage to TMU. If needed this entry can be placed inside
> +		board/platform specific dts file.
>  
>  Example 1):
>  
> @@ -25,6 +28,7 @@ Example 1):
>  		clocks = <&clock 383>;
>  		clock-names = "tmu_apbif";
>  		status = "disabled";
> +		vtmu-supply = <&tmu_regulator_node>;
>  	};
>  
>  Example 2):
> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c b/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c
> index 72446c9..b7c609a 100644
> --- a/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c
> +++ b/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c
> @@ -32,6 +32,7 @@
>  #include <linux/of_address.h>
>  #include <linux/of_irq.h>
>  #include <linux/platform_device.h>
> +#include <linux/regulator/consumer.h>
>  #include <linux/slab.h>
>  #include <linux/workqueue.h>
>  #include "exynos_thermal_common.h"
> @@ -52,6 +53,7 @@
>   * @clk: pointer to the clock structure.
>   * @temp_error1: fused value of the first point trim.
>   * @temp_error2: fused value of the second point trim.
> + * @regulator: pointer to the TMU regulator structure.
>   * @reg_conf: pointer to structure to register with core thermal.
>   */
>  struct exynos_tmu_data {
> @@ -65,6 +67,7 @@ struct exynos_tmu_data {
>  	struct mutex lock;
>  	struct clk *clk;
>  	u8 temp_error1, temp_error2;
> +	struct regulator *regulator;
>  	struct thermal_sensor_conf *reg_conf;
>  };
>  
> @@ -501,10 +504,23 @@ static int exynos_map_dt_data(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	struct exynos_tmu_data *data = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
>  	struct exynos_tmu_platform_data *pdata = data->pdata;
>  	struct resource res;
> +	int ret;
>  
>  	if (!data)
>  		return -ENODEV;
>  
> +	/* Try enabling the regulator if found */
> +	data->regulator = devm_regulator_get(&pdev->dev, "vtmu");
> +	if (!IS_ERR(data->regulator)) {
> +		ret = regulator_enable(data->regulator);
> +		if (ret) {
> +			dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to enable vtmu\n");
> +			return ret;
> +		}
> +	} else {
> +		dev_info(&pdev->dev, "Regulator node (vtmu) not found\n");

Now that you have a bitfield for your features, shouldnt this become a
check? If the SoC requires the regulator, then it has to return a valid
regulator (regulator_get). Meaning, if your SoC version requires this
feature and the regulator_get returns an error, you must treat as an
error an not continue gracefuly.

> +	}
> +
>  	data->id = of_alias_get_id(pdev->dev.of_node, "tmuctrl");
>  	if (data->id < 0)
>  		data->id = 0;
> @@ -669,6 +685,9 @@ static int exynos_tmu_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  
>  	clk_unprepare(data->clk);
>  
> +	if (!IS_ERR(data->regulator))
> +		regulator_disable(data->regulator);
> +
>  	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, NULL);
>  
>  	return 0;
>

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature