Re: [PATCH 0/3] pm: Introduce __pm to mark power management code

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

On Thursday, May 09, 2013 10:09:23 AM Guenter Roeck wrote:
> The following patch series introduces a marker for power management functions
> and data. This this marker, #ifdef CONFIG_PM and #ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
> can be removed from most of the code. This ensures that the conditional code
> still compiles but is not included in the object file.
> 
> As a side effect, drivers declaring struct dev_pm_ops unconditionally
> get a bit smaller if CONFIG_PM_SLEEP is not configured.
> 
> The first patch in the series introduces the marker, the following
> two patches introduce the marker in two drivers to demonstrate its use.
> 
> The patch series depends on the "PM: Add pm_ops_ptr() macro" patch
> submitted by Jingoo Han.

What about CCing a PM core maintainer?

Please see my reply to Alan Stern for my opinion.

Thanks,
Rafael


-- 
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/