Re: dm-cache not writing out cache metadata at reboot?

From: Darrick J. Wong
Date: Thu May 09 2013 - 16:36:25 EST


On Wed, May 08, 2013 at 06:05:26PM -0400, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> On Wed, May 08 2013 at 5:48pm -0400,
> Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > So I've been watching the hit/miss counters in dmcache and I've noticed a
> > couple of things that look like errors to me:
> >
> > First, I noticed that if I reboot the system, neither cache_postsuspend nor
> > cache_dtr get called. This might simply be expected behavior, but it means
> > that the in-memory superblock structure doesn't get written out to disk upon
> > reboot. Just to be sure, I put a printk into __commit_transaction. It prints
> > out for 'dmsetup info' and 'dmsetup remove' but nothing at reboot.
>
> We don't have reboot notifiers that auto-magically tear down an
> artbitrary DM stack. Typically the device shutdown includes unmounting
> filesystems, stopping LVM (which tears down DM devices, etc).
>
> So given that we don't have any userspace LVM2 support for dm-cache yet
> I'm not surprised by this. In fact it is expected.
>
> > Second, cache_status calls dm_cache_commit, which writes out a superblock to
> > the metadata device. However, there's no call to save_stats to copy the
> > current values of the counters out to the disk's copy prior to calling
> > dm_cache_commit. Therefore, we seem to be writing out stale copies of
> > superblock fields.
> >
> > The second one seems fixable with the attached patch
>
> I'll defer to Joe on this but I think sync_metadata() is pretty heavy to
> be doing every 'dmsetup info'. BTW, with just dm_cache_commit() the
> superblock fields aren't stale; only the on-disk hints are.

Hrmm, how about this: dmsetup info will call save_stats so that the superblock
gets written with the freshest hit/miss counts, and I'll create a new dmsetup
message command that actually flushes everything out?

--D
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/