RE: device tree not the answer in the ARM world [was: Re: runningDebian on a Cubieboard]

[Yuhong Bao]

----------------------------------------
> From: yuhongbao_386@xxxxxxxxxxx
> To: lkcl@xxxxxxxx; hancockrwd@xxxxxxxxx
> CC: david.goodenough@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; debian-arm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; arm-netbook@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: device tree not the answer in the ARM world [was: Re: running Debian on a Cubieboard]
> Date: Thu, 9 May 2013 17:56:33 -0700
>
> > the economics of market forces don't work that way.
> > profit-maximising companies are pathologically and *LEGALLY* bound to
> > enact the articles of incorporation. so you'd need to show them that
> > it would hurt their profits to continue the way that they are going.
> I think legally bound is a myth, but that is off-topic for lkml of course.
And obviously it doesn't matter if it is actually required by law if they practically behave that way.

Yuhong Bao 		 	   		  --
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/