Re: [PATCH RFC] clk: Introduce userspace clock driver
From: Saravana Kannan
Date: Fri May 10 2013 - 19:26:06 EST
On 05/10/2013 04:06 PM, SÃren Brinkmann wrote:
On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 04:01:25PM -0700, Saravana Kannan wrote:
On 05/10/2013 03:18 PM, Mike Turquette wrote:
I think that Soren wants something with a stable interface that he can
use for his Zynq use case. Regarding that, why not write an actual
device driver to do what you want to do from userspace?
Exposing clock control to userspace production use is a terrible
idea. A misbehaving userspace can easily kill the system. This is
not so try for GPIO. So, exposing GPIOs to userspace is relatively
less of a concern.
Well, the FPGA clocks are only used by stuff in the FPGA. They cannot
mess up the Linux on the A9s. I my use-case is kinda special. And people
request functionality to easily adjust the frequency for their FPGA
design in SW from Linux.
How do you talk to the FPGA? What happens if the FPGA clock gets turned
off when the Linux is communicating with it? At the least the I2C or
whatever bus you used to talk to it could hang. You need to explain more
about why it's "special" before people might turn around to give
userspace ABI for clock control.
Nevertheless, there is no real protection from taking the driver I'm
proposing to control the FPGA clocks to control a clock vital to the
system.
If we are talking about changing the kernel to control different clocks,
that true for any driver.
If your idea of this driver was something that will take a clock name
and rate and change that clock's rate, then that's not a good design.
What Mike probably meant was a FPGA specific driver that will only
clk_get() the clocks related to the FPGA, and expose options to
userspace. Not the actual rate or enable/disable capability.
For example, opening the device could cause clk_prepare_enable() and
closing it would cause clk_disable_unprepare(). You might have ioctls to
let userspace pick one of different modes of operation with each
corresponding to a different clock rate and other corresponding FPGA
configuration changes, etc. That's just a rough sketch. If you write
such a driver, userspace can't misuse it to mess with other clocks or
leave the FPGA clock in a bad state.
-Saravana
--
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/