Re: [PATCH V3 10/21] thermal: exynos: Fix to clear only the generated interrupts

From: amit daniel kachhap
Date: Sun May 12 2013 - 21:36:51 EST


On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 9:10 PM, Eduardo Valentin
<eduardo.valentin@xxxxxx> wrote:
> On 09-05-2013 22:22, amit daniel kachhap wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 8:03 PM, Eduardo Valentin
>> <eduardo.valentin@xxxxxx> wrote:
>>> On 07-05-2013 09:01, Amit Daniel Kachhap wrote:
>>>> This patch uses the TMU status register to know the generated interrupts
>>>> and only clear them in the interrupt handler.
>>>>
>>>> Acked-by: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.daniel@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>> ---
>>>> drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c | 10 ++++------
>>>> drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu_data.c | 2 ++
>>>> 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c b/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c
>>>> index 97b87aa..082d5a2 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c
>>>> @@ -325,17 +325,15 @@ static void exynos_tmu_work(struct work_struct *work)
>>>> struct exynos_tmu_data, irq_work);
>>>> struct exynos_tmu_platform_data *pdata = data->pdata;
>>>> struct exynos_tmu_registers *reg = pdata->registers;
>>>> + unsigned int val_irq;
>>>>
>>>> exynos_report_trigger();
>>>> mutex_lock(&data->lock);
>>>> clk_enable(data->clk);
>>>>
>>>> - if (data->soc == SOC_ARCH_EXYNOS)
>>>> - writel((reg->inten_rise_mask << reg->inten_rise_shift) |
>>>> - (reg->inten_fall_mask << reg->inten_fall_shift),
>>>> - data->base + reg->tmu_intclear);
>>>> - else
>>>> - writel(reg->inten_rise_mask, data->base + reg->tmu_intclear);
>>>> + val_irq = readl(data->base + reg->tmu_intstat);
>>>> + /* clear the interrupts */
>>>> + writel(val_irq, data->base + reg->tmu_intclear);
>>>>
>>>
>>> hmmm.. Don t you need to act accordingly depending on what is in your
>>> int status?
>>
>> Earlier also it is done like this way. Basically core thermal layer
>> checks temp for each trip so even if I check for which threshold
>> interrupt is raised it is of no use. Anyway this is a TODO for me.
>>
>
> Please add a /* TODO: */ entry then.
ok,

Thanks,
Amit Daniel
>
>> Thanks,
>> Amit Daniel
>>>
>>>> clk_disable(data->clk);
>>>> mutex_unlock(&data->lock);
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu_data.c b/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu_data.c
>>>> index 3a1ded1..7322597 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu_data.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu_data.c
>>>> @@ -45,6 +45,7 @@ static struct exynos_tmu_registers exynos4210_tmu_registers = {
>>>> .inten_rise1_shift = EXYNOS_TMU_INTEN_RISE1_SHIFT,
>>>> .inten_rise2_shift = EXYNOS_TMU_INTEN_RISE2_SHIFT,
>>>> .inten_rise3_shift = EXYNOS_TMU_INTEN_RISE3_SHIFT,
>>>> + .tmu_intstat = EXYNOS_TMU_REG_INTSTAT,
>>>> .tmu_intclear = EXYNOS_TMU_REG_INTCLEAR,
>>>> };
>>>> struct exynos_tmu_platform_data const exynos4210_default_tmu_data = {
>>>> @@ -111,6 +112,7 @@ static struct exynos_tmu_registers exynos5250_tmu_registers = {
>>>> .inten_rise2_shift = EXYNOS_TMU_INTEN_RISE2_SHIFT,
>>>> .inten_rise3_shift = EXYNOS_TMU_INTEN_RISE3_SHIFT,
>>>> .inten_fall0_shift = EXYNOS_TMU_INTEN_FALL0_SHIFT,
>>>> + .tmu_intstat = EXYNOS_TMU_REG_INTSTAT,
>>>> .tmu_intclear = EXYNOS_TMU_REG_INTCLEAR,
>>>> .emul_con = EXYNOS_EMUL_CON,
>>>> .emul_temp_shift = EXYNOS_EMUL_DATA_SHIFT,
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/