Re: [RFC PATCH v3 2/5] powerpc: Exception hooks for contexttracking subsystem

[Li Zhong]

On Mon, 2013-05-13 at 19:06 +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-05-13 at 16:44 +0800, Li Zhong wrote:
> > Yes, the above and hash_page() are two C functions for a same exception.
> > And the exception hooks enable RCU usage in those C codes. But for asm
> > codes, I think we could assume that there would be no RCU usage there,
> > so we don't need wrap them in the hooks.
> 
> hash_page() won't start a new RCU, at least not in its current incarnation,
> the only thing I can see it ever doing would be to take some RCU read locks one
> day (it doesn't today).

Seems I added the hooks because of the trace point of hcall
entry/exit ...

Thanks, Zhong

> 
> low_hash_fault() is a different beast. It will typically kill things, thus
> involving sending signals etc... RCU might well be involved.
> 
> Cheers,
> Ben.
> 
> 


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/