Re: [patch 0/8] genirq: Support for irq domains in generic irq chip- V2

[Thomas Gleixner]

On Mon, 13 May 2013, Gerlando Falauto wrote:
> 1) What happened to your initial proposal of renaming gc->mask_cache to
> gc->shared_mask_cache? Does that mean you intend to keep compatibility so
> individual drivers can be updated one at a time?

Yes.
 
> 2) What shall we do with such potential patches for individual drivers, given
> the dependencies on your work? Wait until yours get merged?

I'll provide a branch for the SoC folks, which they can pull into
their tree, so we don't have cross tree dependencies.
 
> Could this cross-posting be the root cause for this whole mess?

No idea, really.
 
Thanks,

	tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/