Re: [PATCH v2, part 1 6/9] ACPI, pci_root: use acpi_handle_print()and pr_xxx() to print messages

From: Gu Zheng
Date: Tue May 14 2013 - 04:46:20 EST

Next message: Linus Walleij: "Re: [PATCH 9/9] mfd: ab8500-core: Pass GPADC compatible string to MFD core"
Previous message: Lee Jones: "Re: [PATCH 3/9] clk: ux500: Provide device enumeration number suffixfor SMSC911x"
In reply to: Liu Jiang: "Re: [PATCH v2, part 1 6/9] ACPI, pci_root: use acpi_handle_print()and pr_xxx() to print messages"
Next in thread: Jiang Liu: "[PATCH v2, part 1 7/9] PCI, IA64: minor code clean up"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On 05/14/2013 12:08 AM, Jiang Liu wrote:

> Use acpi_handle_print() and pr_xxx() to print messages in pci_root.c.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Len Brown <lenb@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx>
> Cc: linux-acpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> ---
> drivers/acpi/pci_root.c | 71 ++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------------
> 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c b/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
> index 91ddfd6..9ced5c3 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
> @@ -379,23 +379,23 @@ static int acpi_pci_root_add(struct acpi_device *device,
> struct acpi_pci_root *root;
> u32 flags, base_flags;
> bool is_osc_granted = false;
> + acpi_handle hdl = device->handle;
>
> root = kzalloc(sizeof(struct acpi_pci_root), GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!root)
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> segment = 0;
> - status = acpi_evaluate_integer(device->handle, METHOD_NAME__SEG, NULL,
> - &segment);
> + status = acpi_evaluate_integer(hdl, METHOD_NAME__SEG, NULL, &segment);
> if (ACPI_FAILURE(status) && status != AE_NOT_FOUND) {
> - printk(KERN_ERR PREFIX "can't evaluate _SEG\n");
> + acpi_handle_err(hdl, "can't evaluate _SEG\n");
> result = -ENODEV;
> goto end;
> }
>
> /* Check _CRS first, then _BBN. If no _BBN, default to zero. */
> root->secondary.flags = IORESOURCE_BUS;
> - status = try_get_root_bridge_busnr(device->handle, &root->secondary);
> + status = try_get_root_bridge_busnr(hdl, &root->secondary);
> if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
> /*
> * We need both the start and end of the downstream bus range
> @@ -404,16 +404,16 @@ static int acpi_pci_root_add(struct acpi_device *device,
> * can do is assume [_BBN-0xFF] or [0-0xFF].
> */
> root->secondary.end = 0xFF;
> - printk(KERN_WARNING FW_BUG PREFIX
> - "no secondary bus range in _CRS\n");
> - status = acpi_evaluate_integer(device->handle, METHOD_NAME__BBN,
> + acpi_handle_warn(hdl,
> + FW_BUG "no secondary bus range in _CRS\n");
> + status = acpi_evaluate_integer(hdl, METHOD_NAME__BBN,
> NULL, &bus);
> if (ACPI_SUCCESS(status))
> root->secondary.start = bus;
> else if (status == AE_NOT_FOUND)
> root->secondary.start = 0;
> else {
> - printk(KERN_ERR PREFIX "can't evaluate _BBN\n");
> + acpi_handle_err(hdl, "can't evaluate _BBN\n");
> result = -ENODEV;
> goto end;
> }
> @@ -425,11 +425,11 @@ static int acpi_pci_root_add(struct acpi_device *device,
> strcpy(acpi_device_class(device), ACPI_PCI_ROOT_CLASS);
> device->driver_data = root;
>
> - printk(KERN_INFO PREFIX "%s [%s] (domain %04x %pR)\n",
> + pr_info(PREFIX "%s [%s] (domain %04x %pR)\n",
> acpi_device_name(device), acpi_device_bid(device),
> root->segment, &root->secondary);
>
> - root->mcfg_addr = acpi_pci_root_get_mcfg_addr(device->handle);
> + root->mcfg_addr = acpi_pci_root_get_mcfg_addr(hdl);
>
> /*
> * All supported architectures that use ACPI have support for
> @@ -473,7 +473,7 @@ static int acpi_pci_root_add(struct acpi_device *device,
> dev_info(&device->dev,
> "Requesting ACPI _OSC control (0x%02x)\n", flags);
>
> - status = acpi_pci_osc_control_set(device->handle, &flags,
> + status = acpi_pci_osc_control_set(hdl, &flags,
> OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_CAP_STRUCTURE_CONTROL);
> if (ACPI_SUCCESS(status)) {
> is_osc_granted = true;
> @@ -505,9 +505,9 @@ static int acpi_pci_root_add(struct acpi_device *device,
> */
> root->bus = pci_acpi_scan_root(root);
> if (!root->bus) {
> - printk(KERN_ERR PREFIX
> - "Bus %04x:%02x not present in PCI namespace\n",
> - root->segment, (unsigned int)root->secondary.start);
> + acpi_handle_err(hdl,
> + "Bus %04x:%02x not present in PCI namespace\n",
> + root->segment, (unsigned int)root->secondary.start);
> result = -ENODEV;
> goto end;
> }
> @@ -517,8 +517,8 @@ static int acpi_pci_root_add(struct acpi_device *device,
> if (acpi_gbl_FADT.boot_flags & ACPI_FADT_NO_ASPM)
> pcie_clear_aspm(root->bus);
> } else {
> - pr_info("ACPI _OSC control for PCIe not granted, "
> - "disabling ASPM\n");
> + acpi_handle_info(hdl,
> + "ACPI _OSC control for PCIe not granted, disabling ASPM\n");
> pcie_no_aspm();
> }
>
> @@ -571,12 +571,13 @@ static void handle_root_bridge_insertion(acpi_handle handle)
> struct acpi_device *device;
>
> if (!acpi_bus_get_device(handle, &device)) {
> - printk(KERN_DEBUG "acpi device exists...\n");
> + acpi_handle_printk(KERN_DEBUG, handle,
> + "acpi device exists...\n");
> return;
> }
>
> if (acpi_bus_scan(handle))
> - printk(KERN_ERR "cannot add bridge to acpi list\n");
> + acpi_handle_err(handle, "cannot add bridge to acpi list\n");
> }
>
> static void handle_root_bridge_removal(struct acpi_device *device)
> @@ -602,7 +603,6 @@ static void handle_root_bridge_removal(struct acpi_device *device)
> static void _handle_hotplug_event_root(struct work_struct *work)
> {
> struct acpi_pci_root *root;
> - struct acpi_buffer buffer = { ACPI_ALLOCATE_BUFFER };
> struct acpi_hp_work *hp_work;
> acpi_handle handle;
> u32 type;
> @@ -613,13 +613,11 @@ static void _handle_hotplug_event_root(struct work_struct *work)
>
> root = acpi_pci_find_root(handle);
>
> - acpi_get_name(handle, ACPI_FULL_PATHNAME, &buffer);
> -
> switch (type) {
> case ACPI_NOTIFY_BUS_CHECK:
> /* bus enumerate */
> - printk(KERN_DEBUG "%s: Bus check notify on %s\n", __func__,
> - (char *)buffer.pointer);
> + acpi_handle_printk(KERN_DEBUG, handle,
> + "Bus check notify on %s\n", __func__);
> if (!root)
> handle_root_bridge_insertion(handle);
>
> @@ -627,27 +625,26 @@ static void _handle_hotplug_event_root(struct work_struct *work)
>
> case ACPI_NOTIFY_DEVICE_CHECK:
> /* device check */
> - printk(KERN_DEBUG "%s: Device check notify on %s\n", __func__,
> - (char *)buffer.pointer);
> + acpi_handle_printk(KERN_DEBUG, handle,
> + "Device check notify on %s\n", __func__);
> if (!root)
> handle_root_bridge_insertion(handle);
> break;
>
> case ACPI_NOTIFY_EJECT_REQUEST:
> /* request device eject */
> - printk(KERN_DEBUG "%s: Device eject notify on %s\n", __func__,
> - (char *)buffer.pointer);
> + acpi_handle_printk(KERN_DEBUG, handle,
> + "Device eject notify on %s\n", __func__);
> if (root)
> handle_root_bridge_removal(root->device);
> break;
> default:
> - printk(KERN_WARNING "notify_handler: unknown event type 0x%x for %s\n",
> - type, (char *)buffer.pointer);
> + acpi_handle_warn(handle,
> + "notify_handler: unknown event type 0x%xn", type);

Here may be "0x%x\n".

A better way I think is that we can change the format string of printk in acpi_handle_printk()
from "%sACPI: %s: %pV" to "%sACPI: %s: %pV \n", so that there is no need to append the '\n' in the
format string when we call acpi_handle_printk().

Thanks,
Gu

> break;
> }
>
> kfree(hp_work); /* allocated in handle_hotplug_event_bridge */
> - kfree(buffer.pointer);
> }
>
> static void handle_hotplug_event_root(acpi_handle handle, u32 type,
> @@ -661,9 +658,6 @@ static acpi_status __init
> find_root_bridges(acpi_handle handle, u32 lvl, void *context, void **rv)
> {
> acpi_status status;
> - char objname[64];
> - struct acpi_buffer buffer = { .length = sizeof(objname),
> - .pointer = objname };
> int *count = (int *)context;
>
> if (!acpi_is_root_bridge(handle))
> @@ -671,16 +665,15 @@ find_root_bridges(acpi_handle handle, u32 lvl, void *context, void **rv)
>
> (*count)++;
>
> - acpi_get_name(handle, ACPI_FULL_PATHNAME, &buffer);
> -
> status = acpi_install_notify_handler(handle, ACPI_SYSTEM_NOTIFY,
> handle_hotplug_event_root, NULL);
> if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
> - printk(KERN_DEBUG "acpi root: %s notify handler is not installed, exit status: %u\n",
> - objname, (unsigned int)status);
> + acpi_handle_printk(KERN_DEBUG, handle,
> + "notify handler is not installed, exit status: %u\n",
> + (unsigned int)status);
> else
> - printk(KERN_DEBUG "acpi root: %s notify handler is installed\n",
> - objname);
> + acpi_handle_printk(KERN_DEBUG, handle,
> + "notify handler is installed\n");
>
> return AE_OK;
> }

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Linus Walleij: "Re: [PATCH 9/9] mfd: ab8500-core: Pass GPADC compatible string to MFD core"
Previous message: Lee Jones: "Re: [PATCH 3/9] clk: ux500: Provide device enumeration number suffixfor SMSC911x"
In reply to: Liu Jiang: "Re: [PATCH v2, part 1 6/9] ACPI, pci_root: use acpi_handle_print()and pr_xxx() to print messages"
Next in thread: Jiang Liu: "[PATCH v2, part 1 7/9] PCI, IA64: minor code clean up"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]