Re: [PATCH 8/9] pinctrl: abx500: Rejiggle platform data and DTinitialisation

[Lee Jones]

On Tue, 14 May 2013, Linus Walleij wrote:

> On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 3:29 PM, Lee Jones <lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > A pointer to GPIO platform data is always passed to the driver now, so
> > there's little point in checking for 'pdata' and executing the DT case if
> > it's not there. The difference between booting with DT and !DT is when
> > booting with DT, plat_id is not populated. Thus, in the DT case we have
> > to use a DT match table in order to find out which platform we're
> > executing on. So, we're changing the semantics here to only use the
> > match table if no plat_id is supplied though platform data.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Is this really included in the [0/9] fire alarm wrapper statement
> "Important ux500 fixups due for the v3.10 -rc:s"?
> 
> It seems more like a random refactoring to me.
> 
> The commit message fails to specify which regression this
> is fixing, like if it's causing an oops or so.
> 
> So I've tentatively applied it to the pinctrl devel branch for
> v3.11 unless something comes up...

Perhaps the commit message is a bit weak, but yes, it _needs_ to go
into v3.10, or this driver will be _broken_ when we boot with DT.

Please apply this to your -fixes branch.

-- 
Lee Jones
Linaro ST-Ericsson Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org â Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/