Hi Christian,Ok. will do.
Le 13/05/2013 22:06, Christian Daudt a écrit :On 13-05-13 02:44 AM, Maxime Ripard wrote:Thanks!Commit ebafed7a ("ARM: irq: Call irqchip_init if no init_irq function isAcked-by: Christian Daudt <csd@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
specified") removed the need to explictly setup the init_irq field in
the machine description when using only irqchip_init. Remove that
declaration for bcm281xx as well.
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/arm/mach-bcm/board_bcm.c | 1 -
1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-bcm/board_bcm.c
b/arch/arm/mach-bcm/board_bcm.c
index 22e8421..24556cf 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-bcm/board_bcm.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-bcm/board_bcm.c
@@ -54,7 +54,6 @@ static void __init board_init(void)
static const char * const bcm11351_dt_compat[] = { "bcm,bcm11351",
NULL, };
DT_MACHINE_START(BCM11351_DT, "Broadcom Application Processor")
- .init_irq = irqchip_init,
.init_time = clocksource_of_init,
.init_machine = board_init,
.dt_compat = bcm11351_dt_compat,
I forgot to remove the include of irqchip.h into all these patches, so
I'll send a v2, and I guess you could probably merge it through your
tree after that directly.