Re: [PATCH V1 resend] cpufreq: Raname index as data in cpufreq_frequency_table

[Stephen Warren]

On 05/14/2013 07:46 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
...
> This must address your concerns:
> @Rafael: I have attached both patches now for you to apply.
> 
> From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Tue, 14 May 2013 19:08:50 +0530
> Subject: [PATCH 1/2] cpufreq: tegra: Remove irrelevant comment
> 
> Tegra cpufreq driver doesn't use .index field of cpufreq_frequency_table and so
> comment mentioning order of .index is irrelevant. Remove it.

> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/tegra-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/tegra-cpufreq.c

> -/* Frequency table index must be sequential starting at 0 */
>  static struct cpufreq_frequency_table freq_table[] = {
>  	{ 0, 216000 },
>  	{ 1, 312000 },

Does the .index/.data field even need to be filled in any more?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/