[PATCH 1/2] f2fs: fix inconsistency of block count during recovery

[Jaegeuk Kim]

Currently f2fs recovers the dentry of fsynced files.
When power-off-recovery is conducted, this newly recovered inode should increase
node block count as well as inode block count.

This patch resolves this inconsistency that results in:

1. create a file
2. write data
3. fsync
4. reboot without sync
5. mount and recover the file
6. node block count is 1 and inode block count is 2
 : fall into the inconsistent state
7. unlink the file
 : trigger the following BUG_ON

------------[ cut here ]------------
kernel BUG at /home/zeus/f2fs_test/src/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h:716!
Call Trace:
 [<ffffffffa0344100>] ? get_node_page+0x50/0x1a0 [f2fs]
 [<ffffffffa0344bfc>] remove_inode_page+0x8c/0x100 [f2fs]
 [<ffffffffa03380f0>] ? f2fs_evict_inode+0x180/0x2d0 [f2fs]
 [<ffffffffa033812e>] f2fs_evict_inode+0x1be/0x2d0 [f2fs]
 [<ffffffff811c7a67>] evict+0xa7/0x1a0
 [<ffffffff811c82b5>] iput+0x105/0x190
 [<ffffffff811c2b30>] d_kill+0xe0/0x120
 [<ffffffff811c2c57>] dput+0xe7/0x1e0
 [<ffffffff811acc3d>] __fput+0x19d/0x2d0
 [<ffffffff811acd7e>] ____fput+0xe/0x10
 [<ffffffff81070645>] task_work_run+0xb5/0xe0
 [<ffffffff81002941>] do_notify_resume+0x71/0xb0
 [<ffffffff8175f14a>] int_signal+0x12/0x17

Reported-by: Chris Fries <C.Fries@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk.kim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 fs/f2fs/node.c | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/fs/f2fs/node.c b/fs/f2fs/node.c
index 3df43b4..9641534 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/node.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/node.c
@@ -1492,6 +1492,8 @@ int recover_inode_page(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, struct page *page)
 	new_ni = old_ni;
 	new_ni.ino = ino;
 
+	if (!inc_valid_node_count(sbi, NULL, 1))
+		WARN_ON(1);
 	set_node_addr(sbi, &new_ni, NEW_ADDR);
 	inc_valid_inode_count(sbi);
 
-- 
1.8.1.3.566.gaa39828

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/