Re: [PATCH 1/2] f2fs: fix inconsistency of block count during recovery

From: Namjae Jeon
Date: Tue May 14 2013 - 23:47:26 EST


>
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/node.c b/fs/f2fs/node.c
> index 3df43b4..9641534 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/node.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/node.c
> @@ -1492,6 +1492,8 @@ int recover_inode_page(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
> struct page *page)
> new_ni = old_ni;
> new_ni.ino = ino;
>
Hi. Jaegeuk.

I have a minor comment.
> + if (!inc_valid_node_count(sbi, NULL, 1))
> + WARN_ON(1);
How about change WARN_ON(!inc_valid_node_count(sbi, NULL, 1)); ?

Reviewed-by: Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Thanks.
> set_node_addr(sbi, &new_ni, NEW_ADDR);
> inc_valid_inode_count(sbi);
>
> --
> 1.8.1.3.566.gaa39828
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/