Re: [PATCH] staging: vme: fix error return code in vme_user_probe()

[Martyn Welch]

On 14/05/13 15:19, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 02:56:17PM +0100, Martyn Welch wrote:
>> On 13/05/13 09:51, Dan Carpenter wrote:
>>> On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 09:16:00AM +0100, Martyn Welch wrote:
>>>> On 13/05/13 07:05, Wei Yongjun wrote:
>>>>> From: Wei Yongjun <yongjun_wei@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>
>>>>> Fix to return -ENOMEM in the resource alloc error handling
>>>>> case instead of 0, as done elsewhere in this function.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Hi Wei,
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for your patch. As this is resource allocation rather than memory
>>>> allocation that is failing, would -EAGAIN not make more sense than -ENOMEM?
>>>>
>>>
>>> ENOMEM is better.  EAGAIN is for when trylock() fails etc.  In other
>>> words we are not allowed to block and someone is using the lock we
>>> need.
>>>
>>
>> ENOMEM just doesn't seem to describe the error very well. This error will be
>> triggered if no free VME windows are available for the driver to use - there
>> are typically 8 master and 8 slave windows provided in hardware.
>>
>> How about EBUSY (Device or resource busy)?
> 
> EBUSY would work.
> 

Hi Wei,

Would you mind resubmitting your patch returning the error code EBUSY rather
than ENOMEM?

Martyn

-- 
Martyn Welch (Lead Software Engineer)  | Registered in England and Wales
GE Intelligent Platforms               | (3828642) at 100 Barbirolli Square
T +44(0)1327322748                     | Manchester, M2 3AB
E martyn.welch@xxxxxx                  | VAT:GB 927559189
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/