Re: [PATCH 17/21] Percpu tag allocator
From: Oleg Nesterov
Date: Wed May 15 2013 - 12:14:20 EST
Damn, sorry for extra noise, I forgot to ask this twice...
And what about cpu_down()? Perhaps tag_pool should do move_tags()
on CPU_DEAD?
Or at least it should be documented that the dead cpu can lose up
to 2 * watermark entries.
Oleg.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/