Re: V3.10-rc1 memory leak
From: Steven Rostedt
Date: Wed May 15 2013 - 15:46:30 EST
On Wed, 2013-05-15 at 15:33 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> Instead of just picking data sections by name (names that start
> with .data, .bss or .ref.data), use the section flags and scan all
> sections that are allocated, writable and not executable. Which should
> cover all sections of a module that might reference data.
After this patch is applied, you can add this one too:
kmemleak: No need for scanning specific module sections
As kmemleak now scans all module sections that are allocated, writable
and non executable, there's no need to scan individual sections that
might reference data.
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Index: linux-trace.git/kernel/module.c
===================================================================
--- linux-trace.git.orig/kernel/module.c
+++ linux-trace.git/kernel/module.c
@@ -2772,24 +2772,11 @@ static void find_module_sections(struct
mod->trace_events = section_objs(info, "_ftrace_events",
sizeof(*mod->trace_events),
&mod->num_trace_events);
- /*
- * This section contains pointers to allocated objects in the trace
- * code and not scanning it leads to false positives.
- */
- kmemleak_scan_area(mod->trace_events, sizeof(*mod->trace_events) *
- mod->num_trace_events, GFP_KERNEL);
#endif
#ifdef CONFIG_TRACING
mod->trace_bprintk_fmt_start = section_objs(info, "__trace_printk_fmt",
sizeof(*mod->trace_bprintk_fmt_start),
&mod->num_trace_bprintk_fmt);
- /*
- * This section contains pointers to allocated objects in the trace
- * code and not scanning it leads to false positives.
- */
- kmemleak_scan_area(mod->trace_bprintk_fmt_start,
- sizeof(*mod->trace_bprintk_fmt_start) *
- mod->num_trace_bprintk_fmt, GFP_KERNEL);
#endif
#ifdef CONFIG_FTRACE_MCOUNT_RECORD
/* sechdrs[0].sh_size is always zero */
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/