Re: [PATCHv11 3/4] zswap: add to mm/

[Rik van Riel]

On 05/15/2013 05:36 PM, Dan Magenheimer wrote:

> If you disagree with any of my arguments earlier in this thread,
> please say so.  Else, please reinforce that the MM subsystem
> needs to dynamically adapt to a broad range of workloads,
> which zswap does not (yet) do.  Zswap is not simple, it is
> simplistic*.
>
> IMHO, it may be OK for a driver to be ham-handed in its memory
> use, but that's not OK for something in mm/.

It is functionality that a lot of people want.

IMHO it should be where it has most eyes on it, so its
deficiencies can be fixed. At this point all we know is
that zswap is somewhat simplistic, but we have no idea
yet what its failures modes are in practice.

The only way to find out, is to start using it.

--
All rights reversed
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/