Re: [PATCH 0/3] CPUFreq Fixes for 3.10-rc2

[Viresh Kumar]

On 18 May 2013 05:10, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> Well, I actually meant "can you please verify your belief?". :-)
>
> And that's because I'm wondering why the zero-day build testing doesn't
> catch this problem.  Apparently, it doesn't build .configs with cpufreq
> governors configured as modules, although I believe it does test
> "make allmodconfig" for a couple of architectures at least.  What gives?

My assumption was wrong. Actually cpufreq_governor.c is never compiled
as module, but cpufreq_ondemand is...

And this routine isn't used from cpufreq_ondemand but cpufreq_governor..

But we were lucky that we didn't get a error here and EXPORT_SYMBOL
is still required :)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/