Re: [PATCH v3 net-next 0/4] net: low latency Ethernet device polling

[Eliezer Tamir]

On 21/05/2013 21:15, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-05-21 at 15:29 +0300, Eliezer Tamir wrote:
> > Many of the questions you asked are covered in our RFC cover letter, but
> > I will touch them briefly
> >
> > On 21/05/2013 15:06, Alex Rosenbaum wrote:
> > > 1. It seem this patch does not cover epoll/select and such IO muxing APIs?
> >
> > We are thinking about how to implement epoll support as one of the next
> > steps.
> >
> > What benchmarks are you using to test poll/select/epoll?
> [...]
>
> I raised this issue back at Plumbers and I thought Jesse said poll() was
> covered.  It's likely to be a bit of a toy without that.  Also, UDP?

The current patchset covers poll/select for UDP.
Adding poll/select for TCP should be simple, I will try to include it in 
the next version.

Epoll should see a gain from the above in the case where all the polled 
file descriptors are associated to the same device queue.
A fuller implementation, in the epoll itself would be needed to cover 
multiple queues/devices.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/