Re: [Patch v2] skbuff: Hide GFP_ATOMIC page allocation failures fordropped packets

[Eric Dumazet]

On Mon, 2013-05-27 at 21:31 -0700, Joe Perches wrote:

> I think the __alloc_skb alloc failure message is ok,
> but maybe there shouldn't be something "scary" like
> a dump_stack.
> 
> Maybe this site should use a trivial debug error
> message like below instead.
> ---

Oh well.

If dump_stack are scary, they are scary for every k[mz]alloc() users,
not only __alloc_skb_alloc()

I just said : Please do not add GFP_NOWARN to thousand of call sites,
and you suggest adding more code in network fast path. (???)

This is not a trivial code, we are speaking of a very sensitive one.

Let mm guys explain in what cases a full stack trace is nice to have,
and in what cases its useless. An heuristic should be defined in mm tree
for that, and not spread everywhere.

There must be a reason GFP_NOWARN is seldom used in the kernel, even if
most callers are able to recover properly from a failed memory
allocation.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/