Re: [PATCH] MTD: atmel_nand: using a stronger ECC is not dangerous

[Josh Wu]

On 5/31/2013 10:34 PM, Richard Genoud wrote:
> We don't have to issue a warning when a stronger error correting
> capability is chosen.
>
> Signed-off-by: Richard Genoud <richard.genoud@xxxxxxxxx>

Acked-by: Josh Wu <josh.wu@xxxxxxxxx>

Best Regards,
Josh Wu

> ---
>   drivers/mtd/nand/atmel_nand.c |    2 +-
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/atmel_nand.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/atmel_nand.c
> index 2d23d29..2415cdc 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/atmel_nand.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/atmel_nand.c
> @@ -1002,7 +1002,7 @@ static int __init atmel_pmecc_nand_init_params(struct platform_device *pdev,
>   		return err_no;
>   	}
>   
> -	if (cap != host->pmecc_corr_cap ||
> +	if (cap > host->pmecc_corr_cap ||
>   			sector_size != host->pmecc_sector_size)
>   		dev_info(host->dev, "WARNING: Be Caution! Using different PMECC parameters from Nand ONFI ECC reqirement.\n");
>   

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/