Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] migrate: add migrate_entry_wait_huge()
From: Naoya Horiguchi
Date: Mon Jun 03 2013 - 10:35:18 EST
On Mon, Jun 03, 2013 at 03:26:41PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Tue 28-05-13 15:52:51, Naoya Horiguchi wrote:
> > When we have a page fault for the address which is backed by a hugepage
> > under migration, the kernel can't wait correctly and do busy looping on
> > hugepage fault until the migration finishes.
> > This is because pte_offset_map_lock() can't get a correct migration entry
> > or a correct page table lock for hugepage.
> > This patch introduces migration_entry_wait_huge() to solve this.
> >
> > Note that the caller, hugetlb_fault(), gets the pointer to the "leaf"
> > entry with huge_pte_offset() inside which all the arch-dependency of
> > the page table structure are. So migration_entry_wait_huge() and
> > __migration_entry_wait() are free from arch-dependency.
> >
> > ChangeLog v3:
> > - use huge_pte_lockptr
> >
> > ChangeLog v2:
> > - remove dup in migrate_entry_wait_huge()
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Reviewed-by: Rik van Riel <riel@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx # 2.6.35
>
> OK, this looks good to me and I guess you can safely replace
> huge_pte_lockptr by &(mm)->page_table_lock so you can implement this
> even without risky 1/2 of this series. The patch should be as simple as
> possible especially when it goes to the stable.
Yes, I agree.
> > Without 1/2 dependency
> Reviewed-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxx>
Thanks,
Naoya
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/