[13/65] audit: Syscall rules are not applied to existing processes onnon-x86

[Steven Rostedt]

3.6.11.5 stable review patch.
If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Anton Blanchard <anton@xxxxxxxxx>

[ Upstream commit cdee3904b4ce7c03d1013ed6dd704b43ae7fc2e9 ]

Commit b05d8447e782 (audit: inline audit_syscall_entry to reduce
burden on archs) changed audit_syscall_entry to check for a dummy
context before calling __audit_syscall_entry. Unfortunately the dummy
context state is maintained in __audit_syscall_entry so once set it
never gets cleared, even if the audit rules change.

As a result, if there are no auditing rules when a process starts
then it will never be subject to any rules added later. x86 doesn't
see this because it has an assembly fast path that calls directly into
__audit_syscall_entry.

I noticed this issue when working on audit performance optimisations.
I wrote a set of simple test cases available at:

http://ozlabs.org/~anton/junkcode/audit_tests.tar.gz

02_new_rule.py fails without the patch and passes with it. The
test case clears all rules, starts a process, adds a rule then
verifies the process produces a syscall audit record.

Signed-off-by: Anton Blanchard <anton@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxx> # 3.3+
Signed-off-by: Eric Paris <eparis@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 include/linux/audit.h |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/audit.h b/include/linux/audit.h
index 36abf2a..a36d567 100644
--- a/include/linux/audit.h
+++ b/include/linux/audit.h
@@ -481,7 +481,7 @@ static inline void audit_syscall_entry(int arch, int major, unsigned long a0,
 				       unsigned long a1, unsigned long a2,
 				       unsigned long a3)
 {
-	if (unlikely(!audit_dummy_context()))
+	if (unlikely(current->audit_context))
 		__audit_syscall_entry(arch, major, a0, a1, a2, a3);
 }
 static inline void audit_syscall_exit(void *pt_regs)
-- 
1.7.10.4


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/