Re: [patch v4] Soft limit rework

[Balbir Singh]

> OK, let me summarize. The primary intention is to get rid of the current
> soft reclaim infrastructure which basically bypasses the standard
> reclaim and tight it directly into shrink_zone code. This also means
> that the soft reclaim doesn't reclaim at priority 0 and that it is
> active also for the targeted (aka limit) reclaim.
>
> Does this help?
>

Yes. What are the limitations of no-priority 0 reclaim? I'll also look
at the patches

Thanks,
Balbir Singh.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/