Re: [PATCH V3 1/4] ARM: tegra30: clocks: Fix pciex clock registration

[Stephen Warren]

On 06/04/2013 12:57 PM, Jay Agarwal wrote:
> Registering pciex as peripheral clock instead of fixed clock
> as tegra_perih_reset_assert(deassert) api of this clock api
> gives warning and ultimately does not succeed to assert(deassert).
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jay Agarwal <jagarwal@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> Patch is based on remotes/gitorious_thierryreding_linux/tegra/next and should be applied on top of this.

For this change, Mike may as well apply it directly to the clock tree.
Thierry can then pick it up when he rebases his tegra/next tree.

That said, I don't think you should need any of the
TEGRA_CLK_DUPLICATE() entries; the PCIe driver should get its clocks
from device tree now, and hence the driver name in the clock
registration shouldn't be necessary. All of these TEGRA_CLK_DUPLICATE()
entries should be removed en mass sometime soon with luck. So, can you
simply leave the two TEGRA_CLK_DUPLICATE() entries untouched, rather
than changing them?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/