[ 027/184] ring-buffer: Fix race between integrity check and

From: Willy Tarreau
Date: Tue Jun 04 2013 - 18:41:52 EST


2.6.32-longterm review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------
readers

From: Steven Rostedt <srostedt@xxxxxxxxxx>

commit 9366c1ba13fbc41bdb57702e75ca4382f209c82f upstream.

The function rb_check_pages() was added to make sure the ring buffer's
pages were sane. This check is done when the ring buffer size is modified
as well as when the iterator is released (closing the "trace" file),
as that was considered a non fast path and a good place to do a sanity
check.

The problem is that the check does not have any locks around it.
If one process were to read the trace file, and another were to read
the raw binary file, the check could happen while the reader is reading
the file.

The issues with this is that the check requires to clear the HEAD page
before doing the full check and it restores it afterward. But readers
require the HEAD page to exist before it can read the buffer, otherwise
it gives a nasty warning and disables the buffer.

By adding the reader lock around the check, this keeps the race from
happening.

Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Willy Tarreau <w@xxxxxx>
---
kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
index e749a05..6024960 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
@@ -2876,6 +2876,8 @@ rb_get_reader_page(struct ring_buffer_per_cpu *cpu_buffer)
* Splice the empty reader page into the list around the head.
*/
reader = rb_set_head_page(cpu_buffer);
+ if (!reader)
+ goto out;
cpu_buffer->reader_page->list.next = reader->list.next;
cpu_buffer->reader_page->list.prev = reader->list.prev;

--
1.7.12.2.21.g234cd45.dirty



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/