[RFC] Micron M25P80 Part name variants

[Peter Crosthwaite]

Hi All,

For micron M25P80 parts there is a mix of naming conventions in the
device table:

        /* Micron */
        { "n25q064",  INFO(0x20ba17, 0, 64 * 1024, 128, 0) },
        { "n25q128a11",  INFO(0x20bb18, 0, 64 * 1024, 256, 0) },
        { "n25q128a13",  INFO(0x20ba18, 0, 64 * 1024, 256, 0) },
        { "n25q256a", INFO(0x20ba19, 0, 64 * 1024, 512, SECT_4K) },

n25q128 has a11 and a13 variants, while 256 does not. Should this be
consistent across parts? If so should we adopt Liming Wangs "axx"
precedent universally? Here is a hunk from Ed Maste that applies the
relevant change to QEMU (currently on list) that would be nice to
merge. Can we fix this Linux side in similar fashion?

     /* Micron */
-    { INFO("n25q032a",    0x20bb16,      0,  64 << 10,  64, ER_4K) },
-    { INFO("n25q128a11",  0x20bb18,      0,  64 << 10, 256, 0) },
-    { INFO("n25q128a13",  0x20ba18,      0,  64 << 10, 256, 0) },
-    { INFO("n25q256a",    0x20ba19,      0,  64 << 10, 512, ER_4K) },
+    { INFO("n25q032a11",  0x20bb16,      0,  64 << 10,  64, ER_4K) },
+    { INFO("n25q032a13",  0x20ba16,      0,  64 << 10,  64, ER_4K) },
+    { INFO("n25q064a11",  0x20bb17,      0,  64 << 10, 128, ER_4K) },
+    { INFO("n25q064a13",  0x20ba17,      0,  64 << 10, 128, ER_4K) },
+    { INFO("n25q128a11",  0x20bb18,      0,  64 << 10, 256, ER_4K) },
+    { INFO("n25q128a13",  0x20ba18,      0,  64 << 10, 256, ER_4K) },
+    { INFO("n25q256a11",  0x20bb19,      0,  64 << 10, 512, ER_4K) },
+    { INFO("n25q256a13",  0x20ba19,      0,  64 << 10, 512, ER_4K) },

Regards,
Peter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/