Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] cpufreq: Remove unused function __cpufreq_driver_getavg

[Viresh Kumar]

On 4 June 2013 20:36, Stratos Karafotis <stratosk@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 06/04/2013 08:19 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
>> Should this be done in 3/3 ?
>>
>
> acpi-cpufreq does not use mperf after 2/3. Why should we compile it with
> CONFIG_X86_ACPI_CPUFREQ?
> Do you want me to move the change in 3/3?

I somehow feel now that 3/3 should come before 2/3 and then this change
should be merged into it. And at the end we can have this patch as 3/3..

What do you say? core should go last and users/drivers must go first.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/