Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] cpufreq: Remove unused function__cpufreq_driver_getavg

[Stratos Karafotis]

I think you are right. I will reorder 2/3 and 3/3 with the change you suggested.

Thanks,
Stratos

Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>On 4 June 2013 20:36, Stratos Karafotis <stratosk@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On 06/04/2013 08:19 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
>>> Should this be done in 3/3 ?
>>>
>>
>> acpi-cpufreq does not use mperf after 2/3. Why should we compile it with
>> CONFIG_X86_ACPI_CPUFREQ?
>> Do you want me to move the change in 3/3?
>
>I somehow feel now that 3/3 should come before 2/3 and then this change
>should be merged into it. And at the end we can have this patch as 3/3..
>
>What do you say? core should go last and users/drivers must go first.
èº{.nÇ+‰·Ÿ®‰­†+%ŠËlzwm…ébëæìr¸›zX§»®w¥Š{ayºÊÚë,j­¢f£¢·hš‹àz¹®w¥¢¸¢·¦j:+v‰¨ŠwèjØm¶Ÿÿ¾«‘êçzZ+ƒùšŽŠÝj"ú!¶iO•æ¬z·švØ^¶m§ÿðÃnÆàþY&—