Re: [PATCH v2 03/10] zram: use zram->lock to protect zram_free_page()in swap free notify path

From: Jerome Marchand
Date: Wed Jun 05 2013 - 06:26:30 EST


On 06/04/2013 06:06 PM, Jiang Liu wrote:
> zram_free_page() is protected by down_write(&zram->lock) when called by
> zram_bvec_write(), but there's no such protection when called by
> zram_slot_free_notify(), which may cause wrong states to zram object.
>
> There are two possible consequences of this issue:
> 1) It may cause invalid memory access if we read from a zram device used
> as swap device. (Not sure whether it's legal to make read/write
> requests to a zram device used as swap device.)

It's never a good idea to mess with a swap device in use, but AFAICT
nothing prevents it (save for file permissions and admin sanity).

Jerome

> 2) It may cause some fields (bad_compress, good_compress, pages_stored)
> in zram->stats wrong if the swap layer makes concurrently call to
> zram_slot_free_notify().
>
> So enhance zram_slot_free_notify() to acquire writer lock on zram->lock
> before calling zram_free_page().
>
> Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> ---
> drivers/staging/zram/zram_drv.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/zram/zram_drv.c b/drivers/staging/zram/zram_drv.c
> index 5a2f20b..847d207 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/zram/zram_drv.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/zram/zram_drv.c
> @@ -582,7 +582,9 @@ static void zram_slot_free_notify(struct block_device *bdev,
> struct zram *zram;
>
> zram = bdev->bd_disk->private_data;
> + down_write(&zram->lock);
> zram_free_page(zram, index);
> + up_write(&zram->lock);
> zram_stat64_inc(zram, &zram->stats.notify_free);
> }
>
>

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/