Re: [PATCH 1/3] drivers: pinctrl sleep and idle states in the core

[Kevin Hilman]

Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> If a device have sleep and idle states in addition to the
> default state, look up these in the core and stash them in
> the pinctrl state container.
>
> Add accessor functions for pinctrl consumers to put the pins
> into "default", "sleep" and "idle" states passing nothing but
> the struct device * affected.
>
> Solution suggested by Kevin Hilman, Mark Brown and Dmitry
> Torokhov in response to a patch series from Hebbar
> Gururaja.
>
> Cc: Hebbar Gururaja <gururaja.hebbar@xxxxxx>
> Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Kevin Hilman <khilman@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Stephen Warren <swarren@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Wolfram Sang <wsa@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> I'm seeking Gregs ACK on this in the end, so we can take this
> in through the pinctrl tree. But first let's review!

Reviewed-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@xxxxxxxxxx>

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/