Re: [PATCH 2/5] cpufreq:boost: Add support for software based CPUfrequency boost

[Viresh Kumar]

Hi Lukasz,

On 7 June 2013 18:57, Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

I hope you agreed to all the other comments I gave as I don't see an
explicit reply below each of these. I have seen people missing these
in past, so what would be better to do is:
- either reply below each one of them and say yes or no..
- Or write once below many comments and say: All above comments
are accepted.

So, that Reviewer is assured that you haven't missed anything.

> I would prefer to have following fields in the cpufreq_boost structure:
> struct cpufreq_boost {
>         unsigned int    max_boost_freq; /*boost max freq*/
>         unsigned int    max_normal_freq; /*max normal freq
>         int (*low_level_boost) (int state);
>         bool boost_en;  /* indicate if boost is enabled */
> }
>
> The max_{boost|normal}_freq fields will be filed at
> ret = cpufreq_driver->init(policy);
>
> Thanks to them I will avoid calling many times routine, which extracts
> from freq_table maximal boost and normal frequencies.
>
> I could define those variables in the exynos-cpufreq.c driver, but I
> think, that they are more suitable to be embedded at cpufreq_boost
> structure.

I understand that you need these variables (I will still look how you are
using them in next version). But they are per policy and driver isn't
responsible for maintaining them. If they are required then cpufreq
core must find them out and keep in struct cpufreq_policy (as they
are policy dependent)..

So, remove this structure from cpufreq_driver and embed variables
directly.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/