Re: [RFC PATCH 28/50] ASoC: atmel-ssc: prepare clk before callingenable
From: boris brezillon
Date: Mon Jun 10 2013 - 05:28:56 EST
On 10/06/2013 11:06, Mark Brown wrote:
On Fri, Jun 07, 2013 at 09:56:52PM +0200, Boris BREZILLON wrote:
On 07/06/2013 18:55, Mark Brown wrote:
On Fri, Jun 07, 2013 at 06:26:09PM +0200, Boris BREZILLON wrote:
Replace clk_enable/disable with clk_prepare_enable/disable_unprepare to
avoid common clk framework warnings.
Applied since I happened to notice this on he list but you should
*always* CC maintainers on patches otherwise they're likely to get
missed.
I used get_mainainer script and it returns:
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> (supporter:CHAR and MISC DRI...)
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> (supporter:CHAR and
MISC DRI...)
linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (open list)
Please tell me if misuse this script or if I should use something else.
I suspect you only ran this on some of the patches as that's missing
pretty much all of the subsystem maintainers, but in general you always
have to think about the output of get_maintainer.pl - it isn't terribly
reliable.
I use a script to add "cc" and "to" fields to each patch:
to.sh:
#!/bin/bash
opts="--nogit --nogit-fallback --norolestats --pattern-depth=1"
if [[ $(basename $1) =~ ^0000- ]] ; then
./scripts/get_maintainer.pl --nom $opts $(dirname $1)/*
else
maint=$(./scripts/get_maintainer.pl --nol $opts $1)
if [ "$maint" == "" ] ; then
echo "[hidden email]"
else
echo "$maint"
fi
fi
cc.sh:
#!/bin/bash
opts="--nogit --nogit-fallback --norolestats"
if [[ $(basename $1) =~ ^0000- ]] ; then
./scripts/get_maintainer.pl --nom $opts $(dirname $1)/*
else
./scripts/get_maintainer.pl $opts $1
fi
But I guess it does not handle subsystem maintainers.
I'll check it before sending patch series next time.
BTW thanks for applying this patch.
Best Regards,
Boris
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/