Re: am335x: TSC & ADC reworking including DT pieces, take 4

[Samuel Ortiz]

Hi Dmitry,

On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 09:04:16AM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 04:23:58PM +0200, Samuel Ortiz wrote:
> > Hi Sebastian,
> > 
> > On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 01:30:46PM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> > > I believe the whole thing should go via the MFD tree. It touches also
> > > input & iio subsystem. I collected ACKs where I got some in the meantime.
> > Please fix your commit logs, and your subject lines. It should be e.g.
> > mfd: input: ti_am335x_adc: Blablabla
> > 
> > if it's mostly an mfd patch that also touches an input driver.
> > 
> > Then, this is a pretty big patchset, with iio, input and mfd all mixed
> > together and it is likely to create merge conflicts.
> > From what I can see from it, and please correct me if I'm
> > wrong, the iio and input changes depend on the mfd ones, and not the
> > other way around. If that's so, I'm going to ask you to reshuffle your
> > patch set and separate the MFD changes from the iio and input ones. I'll
> > take the MFD ones and will create an immutable branch for Jonathan and
> > Dmitry to pull from and apply the iio and input changes on top of it.
> > Merge conflicts should be mostly avoided that way.
> 
> I purposely left this driver alone as I expected it would be merged
> through MFD tree, so there should not be any merging issues on my side.
Thanks for the notice.
Jonathan, can you guarantee the same for the iio parts ?

Sabastian, hold on before reworking your patchset.

Cheers,
Samuel.

-- 
Intel Open Source Technology Centre
http://oss.intel.com/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/