RE: [PATCH V3 1/4] ARM: tegra30: clocks: Fix pciex clockregistration

[Jay Agarwal]

> Quoting Stephen Warren (2013-06-04 12:08:08)
> > On 06/04/2013 12:57 PM, Jay Agarwal wrote:
> > > Registering pciex as peripheral clock instead of fixed clock as
> > > tegra_perih_reset_assert(deassert) api of this clock api gives
> > > warning and ultimately does not succeed to assert(deassert).
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Jay Agarwal <jagarwal@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > > Patch is based on remotes/gitorious_thierryreding_linux/tegra/next and
> should be applied on top of this.
> >
> > For this change, Mike may as well apply it directly to the clock tree.
> > Thierry can then pick it up when he rebases his tegra/next tree.
> >
> > That said, I don't think you should need any of the
> > TEGRA_CLK_DUPLICATE() entries; the PCIe driver should get its clocks
> > from device tree now, and hence the driver name in the clock
> > registration shouldn't be necessary. All of these
> > TEGRA_CLK_DUPLICATE() entries should be removed en mass sometime
> soon
> > with luck. So, can you simply leave the two TEGRA_CLK_DUPLICATE()
> > entries untouched, rather than changing them?
> 
> Ping on this patch.  I can take it through my tree, but is there going to be
> rework based on Stephen's comments?

Hi Mike,
I have uploaded next version V4 of this patch after taking care of this comment.
¢éì®&Þ~º&¶¬–+-±éÝ¥Šw®žË±Êâmébžìdz¹Þ)í…æèw*jg¬±¨¶‰šŽŠÝj/êäz¹ÞŠà2ŠÞ¨è­Ú&¢)ß«a¶Úþø®G«éh®æj:+v‰¨Šwè†Ù>Wš±êÞiÛaxPjØm¶ŸÿÃ-»+ƒùdš_