RE: [PATCH v3] ARM: dts: OMAP5: Add palmas MFD node and regulatornodes

[J, KEERTHY]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Stephen Warren [mailto:swarren@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2013 9:32 PM
> To: J, KEERTHY
> Cc: Cousson, Benoit; devicetree-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-
> omap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> ldewangan@xxxxxxxxxx; grant.likely@xxxxxxxxxxxx; swarren@xxxxxxxxxx;
> sameo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; gg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] ARM: dts: OMAP5: Add palmas MFD node and
> regulator nodes
> 
> On 06/10/2013 11:30 PM, J Keerthy wrote:
> > This patch adds Palmas MFD node and the regulator nodes for OMAP5.
> >
> > The node definitions are based on: https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/6/6/25
> >
> > Boot tested on omap5-uevm board.
> 
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap5-uevm.dts
> > b/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap5-uevm.dts
> 
> > +	palmas: palmas@48 {
> > +		reg = <0x48>;
> > +		interrupts = <GIC_SPI 7 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>; /* IRQ_SYS_1N
> */
> > +		interrupt-parent = <&gic>;
> > +	};
> > +};
> > +
> > +&palmas {
> > +	compatible = "ti,palmas";
> > +	interrupt-controller;
> > +	#interrupt-cells = <2>;
> 
> I don't really see the point of splitting the node into two parts if
> it's all going into a single file. It made sense if part of the node
> came from a common .dtsi file, but not so much when it doesn't.

The intent was to reduce indentation and to declare its sub-nodes outside
of i2c1. I will club it and resend.

Regards,
Keerthy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/