Re: [RFC v1] MFD: Change TWL6025 references to TWL6032

[Oleksandr Kozaruk]

On 06/07/2013 05:44 PM, gg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> On 2013-06-07 15:36, Mark Brown wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 07, 2013 at 01:53:10PM +0300, Oleksandr Kozaruk wrote:
> > > From: Graeme Gregory <gg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > >
> > > The TWL6025 was never released beyond sample form and was replaced by
> > > the PhoenixLite range of chips - TWL6032. Change the references to
> > > reference the TWL6032 class and name the registers to twl6032 in 
> > > line with
> > > an actual released chip name to avoid confusion.
> > >
> > > Currently there is no users of TWL6025 in the code.
> >
> > Given that the chip exists even if not widely distributed it seems as
> > well to keep the twl6025 references in there at least in the device ID
> > table - it won't do any harm to people using the twl6032 name and might
> > help someone who happens to pick up an old board for whatever reason.
>
> I do not think any "old boards" exist, it really was a limited run!
>
> Graeme
Hello Mark, Graeme,

Taking in account that:
- there is no hardware to test twl6025, testing is not possible;
- there is no documentation for twl6025, and if there are any changes to 
twl6032 is not known;
- twl6032 is available, and in production, twl6025 is not even found on 
ti.com <http://ti.com>

So, what do you think, can this change be accepted?

// I apologize for sending personal e-mails, not to the mail list
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/