Re: pull request: bluetooth 2013-06-13

[John W. Linville]

On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 12:22:28PM +0100, Gustavo Padovan wrote:
> Hi John,
> 
> A few important fixes to 3.10. The first one is a crash fix and talks by itself.
> Then we have the support for a device id, it should be fine if you want to
> remove this. Next there are two btmrvl fixes, one for a potential race
> condition that could make its main thread never stop and the other to fix the
> return code when a memory allocation fails. It was returning 0 instead of
> -ENOMEM. Last is a fix to an issue that affects at least some Thinkpad X60,
> Initialization on those laptops were failing due by unsupported cmd we were
> sending to the device. The patch fixes this by checking if the cmd is
> supported first.
> 
> Please pull or let me know of any concerns you may have.
> 
> 	Gustavo
> 
> ---
> The following changes since commit d90b9e29ec5fe7a08eb7965386ebb47615306584:
> 
>   Merge branch 'for-john' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/iwlwifi/iwlwifi-fixes (2013-06-12 14:28:21 -0400)
> 
> are available in the git repository at:
> 
> 
>   git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bluetooth/bluetooth master
> 
> for you to fetch changes up to 0e1aba9361bf292fbdca781d419dca67d6b9911f:
> 
>   Bluetooth: btmrvl: fix thread stopping race (2013-06-13 11:48:38 +0100)
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------

I applied these manually to the wireless tree:

> Anderson Lizardo (1):
>       Bluetooth: Fix crash in l2cap_build_cmd() with small MTU
> 
> Daniel Drake (1):
>       Bluetooth: btmrvl: fix thread stopping race
> 
> Johan Hedberg (1):
>       Bluetooth: Fix conditions for HCI_Delete_Stored_Link_Key

These I will manually apply to wireless-next:

> Cho, Yu-Chen (1):
>       Bluetooth: Add support for Mediatek Bluetooth device [0e8d:763f]
> 
> Wei Yongjun (1):
>       Bluetooth: btmrvl: fix error return code in btmrvl_sdio_card_to_host()

The device ID one might be OK, but it can wait for now.  The error
return code patch fixes the return code for a function whose return
code isn't actually checked, so it doesn't seem to need a quick fix.

John
-- 
John W. Linville		Someday the world will need a hero, and you
linville@xxxxxxxxxxxxx			might be all we have.  Be ready.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/