Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] cpufreq: ondemand: Change the calculation oftarget frequency

[Borislav Petkov]

On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 12:22:18AM +0300, Stratos Karafotis wrote:
> Please let me share some more test results using aim9 benchmark suite:
> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AnMfNYUV1k0ddDdGdlJyUHpqT2xGY1lBOEt2UEVnNlE&usp=sharing
> 
> Each test was running for 10sec. 
> Total execution time with and without the patch was almost identical, which is
> expected since the tests in aim9 run for a specific period.
> The energy during the test run was increased by 0.43% with the patch.
> The performance was increased by 1.25% (average) with this patch.

Not bad. However, exec_test and fork_test are kinda unexpected with such
a high improvement percentage. Happen to have an explanation?

FWIW, if we don't find any serious perf/power regressions with
this patch, I'd say it is worth applying even solely for the code
simplification it brings.

Thanks.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/