Re: [RFC PATCH v3 2/2] drivers: mfd: vexpress: add Serial PowerController (SPC) support
From: Olof Johansson
Date: Thu Jun 13 2013 - 18:52:34 EST
Hi,
Overall this driver looks like it just needs more cooking
time. It's... gritty. Complicated when it should be simple and
layered. Naming is nonobvious, and overall it's hard to glance at a
function and say "ah, it does <x>".
I think some of this might be because of naming conventions. Lots of long
prefixes, subsystem indirection, etc. I wish I had a straight answer to
what would make it better, but just more overall polish.
So, I have a bunch of comments below. Most of these are related to
readability, which is one of the most important things of new code
these days.
Please find a shorter suitable prefix than vexpress_spc_.* too, it's
way too long.
On Thu, Jun 06, 2013 at 10:59:23AM +0100, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> The TC2 versatile express core tile integrates a logic block that provides the
> interface between the dual cluster test-chip and the M3 microcontroller that
> carries out power management. The logic block, called Serial Power Controller
> (SPC), contains several memory mapped registers to control among other things
> low-power states, operating points and reset control.
>
> This patch provides a driver that enables run-time control of features
> implemented by the SPC control logic.
>
> The driver also provides a bridge interface through the vexpress config
> infrastructure. Operations allowing to read/write operating points are
> made to go via the same interface as configuration transactions so that
> all requests to M3 are serialized.
>
> Device tree bindings documentation for the SPC component is provided with
> the patchset.
>
> Cc: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@xxxxxxx>
> Cc: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Jon Medhurst <tixy@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Achin Gupta <achin.gupta@xxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@xxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Sudeep KarkadaNagesha <Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha@xxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/vexpress-spc.txt | 35 +
> drivers/mfd/Kconfig | 7 +
> drivers/mfd/Makefile | 1 +
> drivers/mfd/vexpress-spc.c | 633 ++++++++++
> include/linux/vexpress.h | 43 +
> 5 files changed, 719 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/vexpress-spc.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/vexpress-spc.txt
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..1d71dc2
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/vexpress-spc.txt
> @@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
> +* ARM Versatile Express Serial Power Controller device tree bindings
> +
> +Latest ARM development boards implement a power management interface (serial
> +power controller - SPC) that is capable of managing power/voltage and
> +operating point transitions, through memory mapped registers interface.
> +
> +On testchips like TC2 it also provides a configuration interface that can
> +be used to read/write values which cannot be read/written through simple
> +memory mapped reads/writes.
A configuration interface for what? Just having it as a PMIC doesn't warrant it
being an MFD, really.
> +- spc node
> +
> + - compatible:
> + Usage: required
> + Value type: <stringlist>
> + Definition: must be
> + "arm,vexpress-spc,v2p-ca15_a7","arm,vexpress-spc"
> + - reg:
> + Usage: required
> + Value type: <prop-encode-array>
> + Definition: A standard property that specifies the base address
> + and the size of the SPC address space
> + - interrupts:
> + Usage: required
> + Value type: <prop-encoded-array>
> + Definition: SPC interrupt configuration. A standard property
> + that follows ePAPR interrupts specifications
> +
> +Example:
> +
> +spc: spc@7fff0000 {
> + compatible = "arm,vexpress-spc,v2p-ca15_a7","arm,vexpress-spc";
Nit: space after comma between strings.
> + reg = <0 0x7FFF0000 0 0x1000>;
#size-cells 2 on the parent bus? That's somewhat unusual. We tend to prefer
lowercase hex.
> + interrupts = <0 95 4>;
> +};
> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/Kconfig b/drivers/mfd/Kconfig
> index d54e985..391eda1 100644
> --- a/drivers/mfd/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/mfd/Kconfig
> @@ -1148,3 +1148,10 @@ config VEXPRESS_CONFIG
> help
> Platform configuration infrastructure for the ARM Ltd.
> Versatile Express.
> +
> +config VEXPRESS_SPC
> + bool "Versatile Express SPC driver support"
> + depends on ARM
> + depends on VEXPRESS_CONFIG
> + help
> + Serial Power Controller driver for ARM Ltd. test chips.
One more line as to what conditions you'd like to have this enabled for would
be good.
> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/Makefile b/drivers/mfd/Makefile
> index 718e94a..3a01203 100644
> --- a/drivers/mfd/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/mfd/Makefile
> @@ -153,5 +153,6 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_MFD_SEC_CORE) += sec-core.o sec-irq.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_MFD_SYSCON) += syscon.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_MFD_LM3533) += lm3533-core.o lm3533-ctrlbank.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_VEXPRESS_CONFIG) += vexpress-config.o vexpress-sysreg.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_VEXPRESS_SPC) += vexpress-spc.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_MFD_RETU) += retu-mfd.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_MFD_AS3711) += as3711.o
> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/vexpress-spc.c b/drivers/mfd/vexpress-spc.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..0c6718a
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/mfd/vexpress-spc.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,633 @@
> +/*
> + * Versatile Express Serial Power Controller (SPC) support
> + *
> + * Copyright (C) 2013 ARM Ltd.
> + *
> + * Authors: Sudeep KarkadaNagesha <sudeep.karkadanagesha@xxxxxxx>
> + * Achin Gupta <achin.gupta@xxxxxxx>
> + * Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@xxxxxxx>
> + *
> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
> + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as
> + * published by the Free Software Foundation.
> + *
> + * This program is distributed "as is" WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY of any
> + * kind, whether express or implied; without even the implied warranty
> + * of MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
> + * GNU General Public License for more details.
> + */
> +
> +#include <linux/device.h>
> +#include <linux/err.h>
> +#include <linux/io.h>
> +#include <linux/interrupt.h>
> +#include <linux/module.h>
> +#include <linux/of_address.h>
> +#include <linux/of_irq.h>
> +#include <linux/slab.h>
> +#include <linux/vexpress.h>
> +
> +#include <asm/cacheflush.h>
> +
> +#define SCC_CFGREG19 0x120
> +#define SCC_CFGREG20 0x124
> +#define A15_CONF 0x400
> +#define A7_CONF 0x500
> +#define SYS_INFO 0x700
> +#define PERF_LVL_A15 0xB00
> +#define PERF_REQ_A15 0xB04
> +#define PERF_LVL_A7 0xB08
> +#define PERF_REQ_A7 0xB0c
> +#define SYS_CFGCTRL 0xB10
> +#define SYS_CFGCTRL_REQ 0xB14
> +#define PWC_STATUS 0xB18
> +#define PWC_FLAG 0xB1c
> +#define WAKE_INT_MASK 0xB24
> +#define WAKE_INT_RAW 0xB28
> +#define WAKE_INT_STAT 0xB2c
> +#define A15_PWRDN_EN 0xB30
> +#define A7_PWRDN_EN 0xB34
> +#define A7_PWRDNACK 0xB54
> +#define A15_BX_ADDR0 0xB68
> +#define SYS_CFG_WDATA 0xB70
> +#define SYS_CFG_RDATA 0xB74
> +#define A7_BX_ADDR0 0xB78
These are register offsets? A shared shrot prefix could make that more obvious
when reading the code below.
> +
> +#define GBL_WAKEUP_INT_MSK (0x3 << 10)
> +
> +#define CLKF_SHIFT 16
> +#define CLKF_MASK 0x1FFF
> +#define CLKR_SHIFT 0
> +#define CLKR_MASK 0x3F
> +#define CLKOD_SHIFT 8
> +#define CLKOD_MASK 0xF
What registers are these for? Having them defined right below the register
helps the mental grouping.
> +
> +#define OPP_FUNCTION 6
> +#define OPP_BASE_DEVICE 0x300
> +#define OPP_A15_OFFSET 0x4
> +#define OPP_A7_OFFSET 0xc
> +
> +#define SYS_CFGCTRL_START (1 << 31)
> +#define SYS_CFGCTRL_WRITE (1 << 30)
> +#define SYS_CFGCTRL_FUNC(n) (((n) & 0x3f) << 20)
> +#define SYS_CFGCTRL_DEVICE(n) (((n) & 0xfff) << 0)
> +
> +#define MAX_OPPS 8
> +#define MAX_CLUSTERS 2
> +
> +enum {
> + A15_OPP_TYPE = 0,
> + A7_OPP_TYPE = 1,
> + SYS_CFGCTRL_TYPE = 2,
> + INVALID_TYPE
> +};
Some brief notes about what the OPPs are here would be beneficial.
Also, prefixing makes more sense:
OPP_TYPE_A15
OPP_TYPE_A7
...
> +#define STAT_COMPLETE(type) ((1 << 0) << (type << 2))
> +#define STAT_ERR(type) ((1 << 1) << (type << 2))
> +#define RESPONSE_MASK(type) (STAT_COMPLETE(type) | STAT_ERR(type))
> +
> +struct vexpress_spc_drvdata {
> + void __iomem *baseaddr;
> + u32 a15_clusid;
> + int irq;
> + u32 cur_req_type;
> + u32 freqs[MAX_CLUSTERS][MAX_OPPS];
> + int freqs_cnt[MAX_CLUSTERS];
Please document the non-obvious ones. Is a15 the dynamic cluster id of the A15
cluster perhaps?
> +};
> +
> +enum spc_func_type {
> + CONFIG_FUNC = 0,
> + PERF_FUNC = 1,
> +};
> +
> +struct vexpress_spc_func {
> + enum spc_func_type type;
> + u32 function;
> + u32 device;
> +};
> +
> +static struct vexpress_spc_drvdata *info;
> +static u32 *vexpress_spc_config_data;
> +static struct vexpress_config_bridge *vexpress_spc_config_bridge;
> +static struct vexpress_config_func *opp_func, *perf_func;
> +
> +static int vexpress_spc_load_result = -EAGAIN;
I think Sam already commented on some of these.
> +
> +static bool vexpress_spc_initialized(void)
> +{
> + return vexpress_spc_load_result == 0;
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * vexpress_spc_write_resume_reg() - set the jump address used for warm boot
> + *
> + * @cluster: mpidr[15:8] bitfield describing cluster affinity level
> + * @cpu: mpidr[7:0] bitfield describing cpu affinity level
> + * @addr: physical resume address
> + */
> +void vexpress_spc_write_resume_reg(u32 cluster, u32 cpu, u32 addr)
> +{
> + void __iomem *baseaddr;
> +
> + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(cluster >= MAX_CLUSTERS))
> + return;
Do you really need these in every function down the call chain?
> +
> + if (cluster != info->a15_clusid)
You make this test in a bunch of places, I think a helper would be beneficial.
cluster_is_a15(cluster), or whatever.
> + baseaddr = info->baseaddr + A7_BX_ADDR0 + (cpu << 2);
> + else
> + baseaddr = info->baseaddr + A15_BX_ADDR0 + (cpu << 2);
> +
> + writel_relaxed(addr, baseaddr);
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * vexpress_spc_get_nb_cpus() - get number of cpus in a cluster
> + *
> + * @cluster: mpidr[15:8] bitfield describing cluster affinity level
> + *
> + * Return: number of cpus in the cluster
> + * -EINVAL if cluster number invalid
> + */
> +int vexpress_spc_get_nb_cpus(u32 cluster)
Nit: nb_cpus? nr_cpus is more common.
> +{
> + u32 val;
> +
> + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(cluster >= MAX_CLUSTERS))
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + val = readl_relaxed(info->baseaddr + SYS_INFO);
> + val = (cluster != info->a15_clusid) ? (val >> 20) : (val >> 16);
> + return val & 0xf;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vexpress_spc_get_nb_cpus);
> +
> +/**
> + * vexpress_spc_get_performance - get current performance level of cluster
> + * @cluster: mpidr[15:8] bitfield describing cluster affinity level
> + * @freq: pointer to the performance level to be assigned
Can't you return the perf level instead, with negative for error?
> + *
> + * Return: 0 on success
> + * < 0 on read error
> + */
> +int vexpress_spc_get_performance(u32 cluster, u32 *freq)
This seems to be a get_freq function, should be named accordingly.
> +{
> + u32 perf_cfg_reg;
> + int perf, ret;
> +
> + if (!vexpress_spc_initialized() || (cluster >= MAX_CLUSTERS))
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + perf_cfg_reg = cluster != info->a15_clusid ? PERF_LVL_A7 : PERF_LVL_A15;
> + ret = vexpress_config_read(perf_func, perf_cfg_reg, &perf);
> +
> + if (!ret)
> + *freq = info->freqs[cluster][perf];
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vexpress_spc_get_performance);
> +
> +/**
> + * vexpress_spc_get_perf_index - get performance level corresponding to
> + * a frequency
> + * @cluster: mpidr[15:8] bitfield describing cluster affinity level
> + * @freq: frequency to be looked-up
> + *
> + * Return: perf level index on success
> + * -EINVAL on error
> + */
Can there be such a thing as overdocumenting stuff? Maybe. :-) For trivial
helpers that don't export an interface it's much better if the code is so
obvious to read than needing a defined interface.
I think you'd be better off without the helper here, since it's only used
a single time.
> +static int vexpress_spc_find_perf_index(u32 cluster, u32 freq)
> +{
> + int idx;
> +
> + for (idx = 0; idx < info->freqs_cnt[cluster]; idx++)
> + if (info->freqs[cluster][idx] == freq)
> + break;
> + return (idx == info->freqs_cnt[cluster]) ? -EINVAL : idx;
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * vexpress_spc_set_performance - set current performance level of cluster
> + *
> + * @cluster: mpidr[15:8] bitfield describing cluster affinity level
> + * @freq: performance level to be programmed
Performance level, or target frequency frequency? Either the help is
wrong, or the name is confusing.
> + *
> + * Returns: 0 on success
> + * < 0 on write error
> + */
> +int vexpress_spc_set_performance(u32 cluster, u32 freq)
Again, set_freq() seems more appropriate.
> +{
> + int ret, perf, offset;
> +
> + if (!vexpress_spc_initialized() || (cluster >= MAX_CLUSTERS))
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + offset = (cluster != info->a15_clusid) ? PERF_LVL_A7 : PERF_LVL_A15;
> +
> + perf = vexpress_spc_find_perf_index(cluster, freq);
> +
> + if (perf < 0 || perf >= MAX_OPPS)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + ret = vexpress_config_write(perf_func, offset, perf);
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vexpress_spc_set_performance);
> +
> +static void vexpress_spc_set_wake_intr(u32 mask)
> +{
> + writel_relaxed(mask & VEXPRESS_SPC_WAKE_INTR_MASK,
> + info->baseaddr + WAKE_INT_MASK);
> +}
> +
> +static inline void reg_bitmask(u32 *reg, u32 mask, bool set)
> +{
> + if (set)
> + *reg |= mask;
> + else
> + *reg &= ~mask;
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * vexpress_spc_set_global_wakeup_intr()
> + *
> + * Function to set/clear global wakeup IRQs. Not protected by locking since
> + * it might be used in code paths where normal cacheable locks are not
> + * working. Locking must be provided by the caller to ensure atomicity.
> + *
> + * @set: if true, global wake-up IRQs are set, if false they are cleared
> + */
> +void vexpress_spc_set_global_wakeup_intr(bool set)
vexpress_spc_set_foo, which passes in "set" which can either be true or false? Say what?
> +{
> + u32 wake_int_mask_reg = 0;
> +
> + wake_int_mask_reg = readl_relaxed(info->baseaddr + WAKE_INT_MASK);
> + reg_bitmask(&wake_int_mask_reg, GBL_WAKEUP_INT_MSK, set);
This helper just obfuscates, in my opinion.
> + vexpress_spc_set_wake_intr(wake_int_mask_reg);
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * vexpress_spc_set_cpu_wakeup_irq()
> + *
> + * Function to set/clear per-CPU wake-up IRQs. Not protected by locking since
> + * it might be used in code paths where normal cacheable locks are not
> + * working. Locking must be provided by the caller to ensure atomicity.
> + *
> + * @cpu: mpidr[7:0] bitfield describing cpu affinity level
> + * @cluster: mpidr[15:8] bitfield describing cluster affinity level
> + * @set: if true, wake-up IRQs are set, if false they are cleared
> + */
> +void vexpress_spc_set_cpu_wakeup_irq(u32 cpu, u32 cluster, bool set)
Same here, set in name vs set argument.
> +{
> + u32 mask = 0;
> + u32 wake_int_mask_reg = 0;
> +
> + mask = 1 << cpu;
> + if (info->a15_clusid != cluster)
> + mask <<= 4;
> +
> + wake_int_mask_reg = readl_relaxed(info->baseaddr + WAKE_INT_MASK);
> + reg_bitmask(&wake_int_mask_reg, mask, set);
> + vexpress_spc_set_wake_intr(wake_int_mask_reg);
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * vexpress_spc_powerdown_enable()
> + *
> + * Function to enable/disable cluster powerdown. Not protected by locking
> + * since it might be used in code paths where normal cacheable locks are not
> + * working. Locking must be provided by the caller to ensure atomicity.
> + *
> + * @cluster: mpidr[15:8] bitfield describing cluster affinity level
> + * @enable: if true enables powerdown, if false disables it
> + */
> +void vexpress_spc_powerdown_enable(u32 cluster, bool enable)
Again with the enable in name vs argument.
> +{
> + u32 pwdrn_reg = 0;
> +
> + if (cluster >= MAX_CLUSTERS)
> + return;
> + pwdrn_reg = cluster != info->a15_clusid ? A7_PWRDN_EN : A15_PWRDN_EN;
> + writel_relaxed(enable, info->baseaddr + pwdrn_reg);
> +}
> +
> +irqreturn_t vexpress_spc_irq_handler(int irq, void *data)
> +{
> + int ret;
> + u32 status = readl_relaxed(info->baseaddr + PWC_STATUS);
Why readl_relaxed() here? Can't you use a normal readl()?
> + if (!(status & RESPONSE_MASK(info->cur_req_type)))
> + return IRQ_NONE;
"pending" is maybe a better term to use than "current" here. I.e. "pending_req"
as a variable name instead.
> +
> + if ((status == STAT_COMPLETE(SYS_CFGCTRL_TYPE))
> + && vexpress_spc_config_data) {
> + *vexpress_spc_config_data =
> + readl_relaxed(info->baseaddr + SYS_CFG_RDATA);
> + vexpress_spc_config_data = NULL;
> + }
> +
> + ret = STAT_COMPLETE(info->cur_req_type) ? 0 : -EIO;
> + info->cur_req_type = INVALID_TYPE;
INVALID_TYPE is 3, so the RESPONSE_MASK() check above will pass. That's
probably not desireable.
> + vexpress_config_complete(vexpress_spc_config_bridge, ret);
> + return IRQ_HANDLED;
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * Based on the firmware documentation, this is always fixed to 20
What is always fixed to 20? the multiplication factor? So why do we need to get
it?
> + * All the 4 OSC: A15 PLL0/1, A7 PLL0/1 must be programmed same
> + * values for both control and value registers.
> + * This function uses A15 PLL 0 registers to compute multiple factor
> + * F out = F in * (CLKF + 1) / ((CLKOD + 1) * (CLKR + 1))
> + */
> +static inline int __get_mult_factor(void)
__get_opp_freq_unit()?
> +{
> + int i_div, o_div, f_div;
> + u32 tmp;
> +
> + tmp = readl(info->baseaddr + SCC_CFGREG19);
> + f_div = (tmp >> CLKF_SHIFT) & CLKF_MASK;
> +
> + tmp = readl(info->baseaddr + SCC_CFGREG20);
> + o_div = (tmp >> CLKOD_SHIFT) & CLKOD_MASK;
> + i_div = (tmp >> CLKR_SHIFT) & CLKR_MASK;
> +
> + return (f_div + 1) / ((o_div + 1) * (i_div + 1));
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * vexpress_spc_populate_opps() - initialize opp tables from microcontroller
> + *
> + * @cluster: mpidr[15:8] bitfield describing cluster affinity level
> + *
> + * Return: 0 on success
> + * < 0 on error
> + */
> +static int vexpress_spc_populate_opps(u32 cluster)
> +{
> + u32 data = 0, ret, i, offset;
> + int mult_fact = __get_mult_factor();
> +
> + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(cluster >= MAX_CLUSTERS))
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + offset = cluster != info->a15_clusid ? OPP_A7_OFFSET : OPP_A15_OFFSET;
> + for (i = 0; i < MAX_OPPS; i++) {
> + ret = vexpress_config_read(opp_func, i + offset, &data);
offset + i
> + if (!ret)
> + info->freqs[cluster][i] = (data & 0xFFFFF) * mult_fact;
> + else
> + break;
> + }
> +
> + info->freqs_cnt[cluster] = i;
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * vexpress_spc_get_freq_table() - Retrieve a pointer to the frequency
> + * table for a given cluster
> + *
> + * @cluster: mpidr[15:8] bitfield describing cluster affinity level
> + * @fptr: pointer to be initialized
> + * Return: operating points count on success
> + * -EINVAL on pointer error
> + */
> +int vexpress_spc_get_freq_table(u32 cluster, u32 **fptr)
> +{
> + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!fptr || cluster >= MAX_CLUSTERS))
> + return -EINVAL;
> + *fptr = info->freqs[cluster];
> + return info->freqs_cnt[cluster];
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vexpress_spc_get_freq_table);
Exporting the pointer to the table is a little scary since the caller
could then modify it. Would be nicer to pass in an array that is
populated.
I feel like a hypocrite for having to say this, but here's there's a need for
docs. You've documented the short trivial functions and not some of the long
ones... :)
> +static void *vexpress_spc_func_get(struct device *dev,
> + struct device_node *node, const char *id)
> +{
> + struct vexpress_spc_func *spc_func;
> + u32 func_device[2];
> + int err = 0;
> +
> + spc_func = kzalloc(sizeof(*spc_func), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!spc_func)
> + return NULL;
> +
> + if (strcmp(id, "opp") == 0) {
> + spc_func->type = CONFIG_FUNC;
> + spc_func->function = OPP_FUNCTION;
> + spc_func->device = OPP_BASE_DEVICE;
> + } else if (strcmp(id, "perf") == 0) {
> + spc_func->type = PERF_FUNC;
> + } else if (node) {
> + of_node_get(node);
> + err = of_property_read_u32_array(node,
> + "arm,vexpress-sysreg,func", func_device,
> + ARRAY_SIZE(func_device));
> + of_node_put(node);
> + spc_func->type = CONFIG_FUNC;
> + spc_func->function = func_device[0];
> + spc_func->device = func_device[1];
> + }
> +
> + if (WARN_ON(err)) {
> + kfree(spc_func);
> + return NULL;
> + }
> +
> + pr_debug("func 0x%p = 0x%x, %d %d\n", spc_func,
> + spc_func->function,
> + spc_func->device,
> + spc_func->type);
> +
> + return spc_func;
> +}
> +
> +static void vexpress_spc_func_put(void *func)
> +{
> + kfree(func);
> +}
> +
> +static int vexpress_spc_func_exec(void *func, int offset, bool write,
> + u32 *data)
> +{
> + struct vexpress_spc_func *spc_func = func;
> + u32 command;
> +
> + if (!data)
> + return -EINVAL;
> + /*
> + * Setting and retrieval of operating points is not part of
> + * DCC config interface. It was made to go through the same
> + * code path so that requests to the M3 can be serialized
> + * properly with config reads/writes through the common
> + * vexpress config interface
> + */
> + switch (spc_func->type) {
> + case PERF_FUNC:
> + if (write) {
> + info->cur_req_type = (offset == PERF_LVL_A15) ?
> + A15_OPP_TYPE : A7_OPP_TYPE;
> + writel_relaxed(*data, info->baseaddr + offset);
> + return VEXPRESS_CONFIG_STATUS_WAIT;
> + } else {
> + *data = readl_relaxed(info->baseaddr + offset);
> + return VEXPRESS_CONFIG_STATUS_DONE;
> + }
> + case CONFIG_FUNC:
> + info->cur_req_type = SYS_CFGCTRL_TYPE;
> +
> + command = SYS_CFGCTRL_START;
> + command |= write ? SYS_CFGCTRL_WRITE : 0;
> + command |= SYS_CFGCTRL_FUNC(spc_func->function);
> + command |= SYS_CFGCTRL_DEVICE(spc_func->device + offset);
> +
> + pr_debug("command %x\n", command);
> +
> + if (!write)
> + vexpress_spc_config_data = data;
> + else
> + writel_relaxed(*data, info->baseaddr + SYS_CFG_WDATA);
> + writel_relaxed(command, info->baseaddr + SYS_CFGCTRL);
> +
> + return VEXPRESS_CONFIG_STATUS_WAIT;
> + default:
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +}
> +
> +struct vexpress_config_bridge_info vexpress_spc_config_bridge_info = {
> + .name = "vexpress-spc",
> + .func_get = vexpress_spc_func_get,
> + .func_put = vexpress_spc_func_put,
> + .func_exec = vexpress_spc_func_exec,
> +};
Caveat: I'm running out of time reviewing this one driver, and didn't look into
the vexpress_config_bridge stuff. Seems like a pretty awkward interface but
I didn't look closer.
> +
> +static const struct of_device_id vexpress_spc_ids[] __initconst = {
> + { .compatible = "arm,vexpress-spc,v2p-ca15_a7" },
> + { .compatible = "arm,vexpress-spc" },
> + {},
> +};
> +
> +static int __init vexpress_spc_init(void)
> +{
> + int ret;
> + struct device_node *node = of_find_matching_node(NULL,
> + vexpress_spc_ids);
> +
> + if (!node)
> + return -ENODEV;
> +
> + info = kzalloc(sizeof(*info), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!info) {
> + pr_err("%s: unable to allocate mem\n", __func__);
> + return -ENOMEM;
> + }
> + info->cur_req_type = INVALID_TYPE;
> +
> + info->baseaddr = of_iomap(node, 0);
> + if (WARN_ON(!info->baseaddr)) {
pr_err() something or other.
> + ret = -ENXIO;
> + goto mem_free;
> + }
> +
> + info->irq = irq_of_parse_and_map(node, 0);
> +
> + if (WARN_ON(!info->irq)) {
pr_err() something or other.
> + ret = -ENXIO;
> + goto unmap;
> + }
> +
> + readl_relaxed(info->baseaddr + PWC_STATUS);
> +
> + ret = request_irq(info->irq, vexpress_spc_irq_handler,
> + IRQF_DISABLED | IRQF_TRIGGER_HIGH | IRQF_ONESHOT,
> + "arm-spc", info);
> +
> + if (ret) {
> + pr_err("IRQ %d request failed\n", info->irq);
> + ret = -ENODEV;
> + goto unmap;
> + }
> +
> + info->a15_clusid = readl_relaxed(info->baseaddr + A15_CONF) & 0xf;
> +
> + vexpress_spc_config_bridge = vexpress_config_bridge_register(
> + node, &vexpress_spc_config_bridge_info);
> +
> + if (WARN_ON(!vexpress_spc_config_bridge)) {
pr_err()
> + ret = -ENODEV;
> + goto unmap;
> + }
> +
> + opp_func = vexpress_config_func_get(vexpress_spc_config_bridge, "opp");
> + perf_func =
> + vexpress_config_func_get(vexpress_spc_config_bridge, "perf");
Your identifiers are so long that you can't fit a simple call on minimum
indentation without wrapping the line. That should be a pretty strong indicator
that it needs to be shortened.
> +
> + if (!opp_func || !perf_func) {
...pr_err()
> + ret = -ENODEV;
> + goto unmap;
> + }
> +
> + if (vexpress_spc_populate_opps(0) || vexpress_spc_populate_opps(1)) {
> + if (info->irq)
> + free_irq(info->irq, info);
> + pr_err("failed to build OPP table\n");
> + ret = -ENODEV;
> + goto unmap;
> + }
> + /*
> + * Multi-cluster systems may need this data when non-coherent, during
> + * cluster power-up/power-down. Make sure it reaches main memory:
> + */
> + sync_cache_w(info);
> + sync_cache_w(&info);
> + pr_info("vexpress-spc loaded at %p\n", info->baseaddr);
> + return 0;
> +
> +unmap:
> + iounmap(info->baseaddr);
> +
> +mem_free:
> + kfree(info);
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static bool __init __vexpress_spc_check_loaded(void);
> +/*
> + * Pointer spc_check_loaded is swapped after init hence it is safe
> + * to initialize it to a function in the __init section
> + */
> +static bool (*spc_check_loaded)(void) __refdata = &__vexpress_spc_check_loaded;
> +
> +static bool __init __vexpress_spc_check_loaded(void)
> +{
> + if (vexpress_spc_load_result == -EAGAIN)
> + vexpress_spc_load_result = vexpress_spc_init();
> + spc_check_loaded = &vexpress_spc_initialized;
> + return vexpress_spc_initialized();
> +}
Whoa. A "check_foo" function with side effects. Red flag.
So, you only want to try to run vexpress_spc_init() on the very first call to
spc_check_loaded()? Just do so in vexpress_spc_initalized() instead and keep
a static bool first_call = true; variable instead. Still confusing and with
side effects though.
> +
> +/*
> + * Function exported to manage early_initcall ordering.
> + * SPC code is needed very early in the boot process
> + * to bring CPUs out of reset and initialize power
> + * management back-end. After boot swap pointers to
> + * make the functionality check available to loadable
> + * modules, when early boot init functions have been
> + * already freed from kernel address space.
> + */
> +bool vexpress_spc_check_loaded(void)
> +{
> + return spc_check_loaded();
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vexpress_spc_check_loaded);
Or, you do that test I mentioned right above here instead.
> +
> +static int __init vexpress_spc_early_init(void)
> +{
> + __vexpress_spc_check_loaded();
> + return vexpress_spc_load_result;
> +}
> +early_initcall(vexpress_spc_early_init);
> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Serial Power Controller (SPC) support");
> diff --git a/include/linux/vexpress.h b/include/linux/vexpress.h
> index 50368e0..c1191ab 100644
> --- a/include/linux/vexpress.h
> +++ b/include/linux/vexpress.h
> @@ -132,4 +132,47 @@ void vexpress_clk_of_register_spc(void);
> void vexpress_clk_init(void __iomem *sp810_base);
> void vexpress_clk_of_init(void);
>
> +/* SPC */
> +
> +#define VEXPRESS_SPC_WAKE_INTR_IRQ(cluster, cpu) \
> + (1 << (4 * (cluster) + (cpu)))
> +#define VEXPRESS_SPC_WAKE_INTR_FIQ(cluster, cpu) \
> + (1 << (7 * (cluster) + (cpu)))
> +#define VEXPRESS_SPC_WAKE_INTR_SWDOG (1 << 10)
> +#define VEXPRESS_SPC_WAKE_INTR_GTIMER (1 << 11)
> +#define VEXPRESS_SPC_WAKE_INTR_MASK 0xFFF
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_VEXPRESS_SPC
> +extern bool vexpress_spc_check_loaded(void);
> +extern void vexpress_spc_set_cpu_wakeup_irq(u32 cpu, u32 cluster, bool set);
> +extern void vexpress_spc_set_global_wakeup_intr(bool set);
> +extern int vexpress_spc_get_freq_table(u32 cluster, u32 **fptr);
> +extern int vexpress_spc_get_performance(u32 cluster, u32 *freq);
> +extern int vexpress_spc_set_performance(u32 cluster, u32 freq);
> +extern void vexpress_spc_write_resume_reg(u32 cluster, u32 cpu, u32 addr);
> +extern int vexpress_spc_get_nb_cpus(u32 cluster);
> +extern void vexpress_spc_powerdown_enable(u32 cluster, bool enable);
> +#else
> +static inline bool vexpress_spc_check_loaded(void) { return false; }
> +static inline void vexpress_spc_set_cpu_wakeup_irq(u32 cpu, u32 cluster,
> + bool set) { }
> +static inline void vexpress_spc_set_global_wakeup_intr(bool set) { }
> +static inline int vexpress_spc_get_freq_table(u32 cluster, u32 **fptr)
> +{
> + return -ENODEV;
> +}
> +static inline int vexpress_spc_get_performance(u32 cluster, u32 *freq)
> +{
> + return -ENODEV;
> +}
> +static inline int vexpress_spc_set_performance(u32 cluster, u32 freq)
> +{
> + return -ENODEV;
> +}
> +static inline void vexpress_spc_write_resume_reg(u32 cluster,
> + u32 cpu, u32 addr) { }
> +static inline int vexpress_spc_get_nb_cpus(u32 cluster) { return -ENODEV; }
> +static inline void vexpress_spc_powerdown_enable(u32 cluster, bool enable) { }
> +#endif
> +
> #endif
> --
> 1.8.2.2
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> devicetree-discuss mailing list
> devicetree-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/