[PATCH v4 net-next 1/4] net: change sysctl_net_ll_poll into anunsigned int

From: Eliezer Tamir
Date: Thu Jun 13 2013 - 21:57:11 EST


There is no reason for sysctl_net_ll_poll to be an unsigned long.
Change it into an unsigned int.
Fix the proc handler.

Signed-off-by: Eliezer Tamir <eliezer.tamir@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---

include/net/ll_poll.h | 5 +++--
net/core/sysctl_net_core.c | 4 ++--
net/socket.c | 2 +-
3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/net/ll_poll.h b/include/net/ll_poll.h
index bc262f8..44e2f70 100644
--- a/include/net/ll_poll.h
+++ b/include/net/ll_poll.h
@@ -34,7 +34,7 @@
#ifdef CONFIG_NET_LL_RX_POLL

struct napi_struct;
-extern unsigned long sysctl_net_ll_poll __read_mostly;
+extern unsigned int sysctl_net_ll_poll __read_mostly;

/* return values from ndo_ll_poll */
#define LL_FLUSH_FAILED -1
@@ -45,7 +45,8 @@ extern unsigned long sysctl_net_ll_poll __read_mostly;

static inline cycles_t ll_end_time(void)
{
- return TSC_MHZ * ACCESS_ONCE(sysctl_net_ll_poll) + get_cycles();
+ return (cycles_t)TSC_MHZ * ACCESS_ONCE(sysctl_net_ll_poll)
+ + get_cycles();
}

static inline bool sk_valid_ll(struct sock *sk)
diff --git a/net/core/sysctl_net_core.c b/net/core/sysctl_net_core.c
index 637a42e..ce9acc2 100644
--- a/net/core/sysctl_net_core.c
+++ b/net/core/sysctl_net_core.c
@@ -289,9 +289,9 @@ static struct ctl_table net_core_table[] = {
{
.procname = "low_latency_poll",
.data = &sysctl_net_ll_poll,
- .maxlen = sizeof(unsigned long),
+ .maxlen = sizeof(unsigned int),
.mode = 0644,
- .proc_handler = proc_doulongvec_minmax
+ .proc_handler = proc_dointvec
},
#endif
#endif /* CONFIG_NET */
diff --git a/net/socket.c b/net/socket.c
index 21fd29f..caaffa1 100644
--- a/net/socket.c
+++ b/net/socket.c
@@ -107,7 +107,7 @@
#include <net/ll_poll.h>

#ifdef CONFIG_NET_LL_RX_POLL
-unsigned long sysctl_net_ll_poll __read_mostly;
+unsigned int sysctl_net_ll_poll __read_mostly;
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(sysctl_net_ll_poll);
#endif


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/