Re: [PATCH] slub: Avoid direct compaction if possible

[Roman Gushchin]

On 14.06.2013 20:08, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Jun 2013, Roman Gushchin wrote:
>
> > But there is an actual problem, that this patch solves.
> > Sometimes I saw the following issue on some machines:
> > all CPUs are performing compaction, system time is about 80%,
> > system is completely unreliable. It occurs only on machines
> > with specific workload (distributed data storage system, so,
> > intensive disk i/o is performed). A system can fall into
> > this state fast and unexpectedly or by progressive degradation.
>
> Well that is not a slab allocator specific issue but related to compaction
> concurrency. Likely cache line contention is causing a severe slowday. But
> that issue could be triggered by any subsystem that does lots of memory
> allocations. I would suggest that we try to address the problem in the
> compaction logic rather than modifying allocators.

I agree, that it's good to address the original issue. But I'm not sure,
that it's a compaction issue. If someone wants to participate here,
I can provide more information. The main problem here is that it's
__very__ hard to reproduce the issue.

But, I think, all that shouldn't stop us from modifying the allocator.
Falling back to minimal order is in any case better than running
direct compaction. Just because it's faster. Am I wrong?

Regards,
Roman
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/